By JB Williams

Obama is touting an armed “national civilian security force” to rival the U.S. military and mandatory “community service” for all children. Obama’s paid “digital brown-shirts” dominated the internet throughout the 2008 election cycle silencing or countering all anti-Obama news stories, often before they even came out, resulting in the election of a man people know literally nothing about.

A sense of civic duty and voluntary civil service has always been a good American idea. Involuntary service forced at gun-point, is something quite different.

Obama has no personal military, intelligence or security experience and his “community service” experience is limited to ACORN, Annenberg and Woods Fund “community organizing” of the Black Panther thugery sort. Obama mentors like Saul Alinsky and William Ayers, taught him all that he knows about civic duty.

But Obama knows something his voters don’t!

As he marches his 63 million mindless minions into unbridled Marxism, it will become impossible to man the U.S. Military through conventional voluntary means. Young American patriots have always been willing to volunteer to risk life and limb for freedom and liberty, but what about for Marxism?

How many young Americans will volunteer to put their lives on the line for Obama’s global socialism? American soldiers have fought and died to spread freedom and end Marxism all over the world. Now they are going to fight and die to defend it here at home?

There was a mass exodus of military personnel at all levels under Clinton, because young men and women trained in the time honored tradition of God and Country, freedom and liberty, would not take orders from a Commander-in-Chief that wrote about how he “loathed the military” as he dodged military service by taking classes at Oxford during Vietnam.

You can only imagine the military reaction to an Arab Commander-in-Chief while soldiers are dying in an ongoing war against radical Arab Islam. You can imagine how many “God and Country” freedom fighters will take orders from a man who has spent his life in a consistent effort to destroy the same constitutional republic that soldiers volunteer to defend.

Democrats to reduce Military Spending by 25%

Democrats now in full control of all branches of government propose reducing the size and power of the U.S. Military by at least 25%, while the nation is at war. More after we retreat from that war…

Once we refuse to fight tyranny and terror abroad, and “change” America to tyrannical One World socialism at home, they are right. A military sworn to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution they aim to dismantle, is counter-productive to the cause. The new mass exodus of true patriots will be welcomed by the new administration.

Hence, the need for a new “brown-shirt” civilian security force to exact Martial Law on an immoral poverty stricken society, operating at the Command of the new “Black House,” as Obama supporters like to refer to it.

Our all volunteer forces are sworn to defend the Constitution and the people against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. The new National Security Force will instead be sworn to support and defend Obama’s administration as it works to effect the kind of “change” that is a direct attack on the Constitution and the people. Not a small difference…

Re-instating the Draft

For all practical purposes, voluntary military service will end on January 20, 2009, unless Obama fails to answer the Supreme Court s demand for a birth certificate by December 1st, leaving the Electoral College unable to certify the Nov. 4^th election on December 13^th.

Americans won’t volunteer their lives in defense of Marxism. People in the military now, will not re-up. They didn’t sign up to defend Marxism. They signed up to defend freedom. The nation just voted against freedom.

The increased threat of homeland terror attacks inherent with the withdrawal from the fields of battle abroad will drive a need for better security at home. As patriots will not volunteer, they will have to be drafted, forced into service, either in Obama’s new military - fighting in defense of international socialism now, - or as a member of Obama’s new National Civilian Security Service, aka “brown-shirts.”

The collapse of America’s financial system, a direct result of past Democrat economic policies consistent with liberals Cloward-Piven Strategy, will cause civil unrest in all major cities across the nation and Obama knows it, even if his voters don’t.

But, unrest in the streets will be easier to control with the use of mandatory community service, ACORN style of course. People can’t resist if they are forced to support the cause via mandatory civil service.

The all volunteer military will soon be gone, replaced by Obama’s “brown-shirt” military, forced to serve via a draft, making it a crime not to serve.

Re-education Camps

People unwilling to serve in the new Marxist government under the mandatory draft must be re-educated. We have seen Obama supporters across the country become belligerent towards anyone willing to disagree. There will be no tolerance for those mounting an insurgency against Obama’s Marxism. The mob has spoken and the rest must accept it!

You were labeled a “racist” if you failed to march in lockstep behind the Obama campaign. Biden told you that you were “unpatriotic” if you resist their right to confiscate more of your hard-earned property, for the greater common good. You will be a “traitor” if you refuse to be drafted into Obama’s national community organizing effort.

You must be punished and you must be taught a lesson! You must get your thinking right and that’s why the “Fairness Doctrine” will be used to silence “Redneck Talk Radio.” The aim is not to get their message out. It’s already out… That’s how they got 63 million voters. The aim is to silence dissenting views and Obama just announced his “Fairness Doctrine” head of the FCC, life-long leftist lawyer Henry Rivera.

This is the New America

According to Obama, this is all for your own good. You failed at individual freedom and he was elected to mandate a greater common good.

Obama will come after your property and your guns. Then he will draft your children into his new civic services community. He will replace an all voluntary military loyal to the people and their constitution with a National Security Force loyal to “change.”

63 million Americans wanted “change.” But they never stopped to ask what kind of change Obama had in mind. They will learn soon enough, the hard way…. as change is a comin’!

And so is the second American Civil War….

By Bob Unruh

Hailing Barack

Obama’s win as a victory for the "working class," the Communist Party USA is calling on the president-elect to carry out his promises, including his noted commitment to "spread the wealth."

An editorial by the People’s Weekly World said the victory was for "workers of all job titles, professions, shapes, colors, sizes, hairstyles and languages."

The newspaper, which boasts of its "partisan coverage," identifies itself as "a national, grassroots weekly newspaper and the direct descendant of the ‘Daily Worker.’"

"We are partisan to the working class, racially and nationally oppressed peoples, women, youth, seniors, international solidarity, Marxism and socialism. We enjoy a special relationship with the Communist Party USA, founded in 1919, and publish its news and views," the publication states.

By Mark Steyn

My Republican friends are now saying, oh, not to worry, look at the exit polls, this is still a “center-right” country. Americans didn’t vote to go left, they voted to go cool. It was a Dancing With The Stars election: Obama’s a star and everyone wants to dance with him. It doesn’t mean they’re suddenly gung-ho for left-wingery.

Up to a point. Unlike those excitable countries where the peasants overrun the presidential palace, settled democratic societies rarely vote to “go left.” Yet oddly enough that’s where they’ve all gone. In its assumptions about the size of the state and the role of government, almost every advanced nation is more left than it was, and getting lefter. Even in America, federal spending (in inflation-adjusted 2007 dollars) has gone from $600 billion in 1965 to $3 trillion today. The Heritage Foundation put it in a convenient graph: It’s pretty much a straight line across four decades, up, up, up. Doesn’t make any difference who controls Congress, who’s in the White House. The government just grows and grows, remorselessly. Every two years, the voters walk out of their town halls and school gyms and tell the exit pollsters that three-quarters of them are “moderates” or “conservatives” (ie, the center and the right) and barely 20 per cent are “liberals.” And then, regardless of how the vote went, big government just resumes its inexorable growth.

“The greatest dangers to liberty,” wrote Justice Brandeis, “lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.”

Now who does that remind you of?

Ha! Trick question! Never mind Obama, it’s John McCain. He encroached on our liberties with the constitutional abomination of McCain-Feingold. Well-meaning but without understanding, he proposed that the federal government buy up all these junk mortgages so that people would be able to stay in “their” homes. And this is the “center-right” candidate? It’s hard for Republicans to hammer Obama as a socialist when their own party’s nationalizing the banks and its presidential nominee is denouncing the private sector for putting profits before patriotism. That’s why Joe the Plumber struck a chord: he briefly turned a one-and-a-half party election back into a two-party choice again.

If you went back to the end of the 19th century and suggested to, say, William McKinley that one day Americans would find themselves choosing between a candidate promising to guarantee your mortgage and a candidate promising to give “tax cuts” to millions of people who pay no taxes he would scoff at you for concocting some patently absurd H G Wells dystopian fantasy. Yet it happened. Slowly, remorselessly, government metastasized to the point where it now seems entirely normal for Peggy Joseph of Sarasota, Florida to vote for Obama because “I won’t have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won’t have to worry about paying my mortgage.”

While few electorates consciously choose to leap left, a couple more steps every election and eventually societies reach a tipping point. In much of the west, it’s government health care. It changes the relationship between state and citizen into something closer to pusher and junkie. Henceforth, elections are fought over which party is proposing the shiniest government bauble: If you think President-elect Obama’s promise of federally subsidized day care was a relatively peripheral part of his platform, in Canada in the election before last it was the dominant issue. Yet America may be approaching its tipping point even more directly. In political terms, the message of the gazillion-dollar bipartisan bailout was a simple one: “Individual responsibility” and “self-reliance” are for chumps. If Goldman Sachs and AIG and Bear Stearns are getting government checks to “stay in their homes” (and boardrooms, and luxury corporate retreats), why shouldn’t Peggy Joseph?

I don’t need Barack Obama’s help to “spread the wealth around.” I spread my wealth around every time I hire somebody, expand my business, or just go to the general store and buy a quart of milk and loaf of bread. As far as I know, only one bloated plutocrat declines to spread his wealth around, and that’s Scrooge McDuck, whose principal activity in Disney cartoons was getting into his little bulldozer and plowing back and forth over a mountain of warehoused gold and silver coins. Don’t know where he is these days. On the board at Halliburton, no doubt. But most of the beleaguered band of American capitalists do not warehouse their wealth in McDuck fashion. It’s not a choice between hoarding and spreading, but a choice between who spreads it best: an individual free to make his own decisions about investment and spending, or Barney Frank. I don’t find that a difficult question to answer. More to the point, put Barney & Co in charge of the spreading, and there’ll be a lot less to spread.

I disagree with my fellow conservatives who think the Obama-Pelosi-Reid-Frank liberal behemoth will so obviously screw up that they’ll be routed in two or four years’ time. The President-elect’s so-called “tax cut” will absolve 48 percent of Americans from paying any federal income tax at all, while those that are left will pay more. Just under half the population will be, as Daniel Henninger pointed out in the Wall Street Journal, on the dole. By 2012, it will be more than half, and this will be an electorate where the majority of the electorate will be able to vote itself more lollipops from the minority of their compatriots still dumb enough to prioritize self-reliance, dynamism, and innovation over the sedating cocoon of the nanny state. That is the death of the American idea — which, after all, began as an economic argument: “No taxation without representation" is a great rallying cry. “No representation without taxation” has less mass appeal. For how do you tell an electorate living high off the entitlement hog that it’s unsustainable and you’ve got to give some of it back?

At that point, America might as well apply for honorary membership in the European Union. It will be a nation at odds with the spirit of its founding, and embarking on decline from which there are few escape routes. In 2012, the least we deserve is a choice between the collectivist assumptions of the Democrats, and a candidate who stands for individual liberty — for economic dynamism not the sclerotic “managed capitalism” of Germany; for the First Amendment, not Canadian-style government regulation of approved opinion; for self-reliance and the Second Amendment, not the security state in which Britons are second only to North Koreans in the number of times they’re photographed by government cameras in the course of going about their daily business. In Forbes this week, Claudia Rosett issued a stirring defense of individual liberty. That it should require a stirring defense at all is a melancholy reflection on this election season. Live free — or die from a thousand beguiling caresses of nanny-state sirens.

By Judi McLeod  

Well it didn’t take long.  Less than one week after the U.S. election, here comes One World Government right on cue.

Exit stage left.  Make that for the entire world, not just the elusive unproven rookie who will transform the United States of America from a democracy into Socialism.

The international financial crisis has given world leaders a unique opportunity to create a truly global economy, Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Grown will say in a keynote foreign policy speech on Monday.

“In his annual speech at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet, Brown—who has spearheaded calls for the reform of international financial institutions—will say Britain, the United States and Europe are key to forging a new world order.” (Reuters, Nov. 9, 2008).

Do any find it too much of a coincidence that international financial institutions—the world over—collapsed at the same time orchestrating the total crash of Capitalism?

At the same time, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has advised that the Obama administration in the United States needs far-reaching `perestroika’ reforms to overcome the financial crisis and restore balance in the world.

Make that the same Gorby who had his American capitalist pig friends arrange millions of dollars for him before he even bailed out of a failing Soviet Union.

The former Soviet leader was handed the keys of a house overlooking the Golden Bridge at the Presidio and has been fomenting for revolution ever since.

A confrere of One World Order lusting, New Ager Maurice Strong, this deadly duo had the arrogance to rewrite the Ten Commandments of Moses.

If that wasn’t enough change in less than a week since the victory of President-elect Barack Hussein Obama, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan has openly named Obama the “New Beginning”.

“President-elect Obama has energized all segments of the depressed, downtrodden, rejected and despised,” he said in a 90-minute speech at Mosque Maryam on Chicago’s infamous south side.  “Now it is up to us to take the new energy that he has given us and channel that energy into making ourselves better,”

What a load of hooey!

Obama has yet to keep a single promise made to the depressed, downtrodden, rejected and despised.  He was elected in one of the most voter fraud challenged elections to date, and there are those who dare argue that he only used the downtrodden to get himself elected as U.S. president.

Notice how the global elitists seem to be speaking with one voice about dramatic changes to the world, as we know it through Obama. 

But now we know for sure what Obama meant by change.

It’s the change the big Pooh-Bahs are demanding, the end of democracy in America, the dawn of the New World Order coming at us within days of the election of their `Agent for Change’.

“…If we learn from our experience of turning unity of purpose of action, we can together seize this moment of change in our world to create a truly global society,” Brown will say in tomorrow’s address.

That’s Brown’s stampede to the New World Order.

Imagine Gorbachev, who lived comfortably in the US all these years now turning around to bite the hand that feeds him.

Gorbachev told Italy’s La Stampa that after transforming his country in the late 1980s, he had told the Americans that it was their turn to act, but that Washington, celebrating its Cold War victory, was not interested in “a new model of a society where politics, economics and morals went hand in hand”.

Why should Americans listen to a leader collecting American contributions on American soil from a man who has never denounced Communism?

He told La Stampa that “the world is waiting for Obama to act”, and that the White House needs to restore trust in cooperation with the United States among the Russians.

“This is a man of our times, he is capable of restarting dialogue, all the more since the circumstances will allow him to get out of a dead-end situation.  Barack Obama has not had a very long career, but it is hard to find faults, and he has led an election campaign winning over the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton herself.  We can judge from this that this person is capable of engaging in dialogue and understanding current realities.”

Glad that Gorbachev knows the real Obama, very few others do.

And just to think we were worried about Obama’s ties to Saul Alinsky!

Without serving a day as President, Obama has reached sainthood among the global brotherhood.

For the millions who were waiting, change came slinking out of the closet this weekend.

Problem is it is a change that will break human spirit as it takes the masses back to serfdom.