Dick-Taters


By Humberto Fontova

There’s no worse crime in journalism these days than simply deciding something’s a story because Drudge links to it.
 - NBC’s Chuck Todd, March 6, 2010.

Oh, really?

Well, how about partnering with a Stalinist regime’s military robber-barons to boost their currency booty and hide their tortures, mass-murders, and mass-jailings? To wit:  

In June 2007, Castro’s Stalinist regime held a “tourism fair” in Havana to kick off an ambitious plan to boost the Cuban military’s tourist booty. By some peculiar coincidence, NBC’s “Today Show” decided to broadcast from Havana that very week. Amidst smiling, clapping, dancing tourists, Matt Lauer and Andrea Mitchell advised viewers on how to legally vacation in Cuba.

Don’t look for this from NBC, but Castro’s Soviet-trained and armed military and secret police own most of Cuba’s tourist facilities. Along with providing these inquisitive Cuban officials with certain insights regarding visitors to Castro’s fiefdom, this setup also insures that most of what tourists spend in Cuba lands in the pockets of the only people in Cuba with guns.

Yet Castro apologists and/or agents (both on the payroll and off) keep insisting that a flood of rich Western tourists will magically smother Cuban Stalinism, whereupon the island nation will quickly mutate into a bigger (and more historic and picturesque) Cozumel. This logic (which NBC’s Matt and Andrea naturally share) seems to go something like this: Rewarding and enriching the KGB-trained and heavily armed guardians of Cuba’s Stalinist status-quo will magically convert them into instant opponents of that Stalinist status quo.

Amazingly, this line of reasoning fails to convince those with firsthand experience under Cuba’s Stalinist regime. But never mind this insufferable rabble of “Cuban-American right-wing crackpots” and their congressional allies. And never mind the evidence.

To wit: For each of the past fifteen years, almost ten times as many tourists have visited Cuba as have visited in any year during the 1950s, when Cuba was labeled a “tourist playground.”

You will note the spectacular liberating effect this has had on Cubans, who with a few exceptions are barred by machine gun-wielding police from excessive interaction with these tourists.

Any trickle of foreign currency reaches the Stalinist regime’s subjects (primarily from prostitution) is offset a thousand-fold by the millions ($2.4 billion last year, for instance) crammed into military and secret-police coffers.

Apparently eager to highlight their hypocrisy, the month prior to their Cuba broadcast, the “Today Show” reported on location from Cape Town, South Africa. “The one indispensable visit on a trip to Cape Town is a pilgrimage to Robben Island [a former political prison],” frowned the Today Show hosts. “Most moving, of course, is the tour through the prison, led by former inmates, where you’ll view the painfully cramped cell where Nelson Mandela spent eighteen of his twenty-seven years in prison.”

Cuban political prisons and political prisoners did not merit any mention during the two-hour “Today Show” Havana broadcast, though hundreds of political prisoners were languishing in Cuba’s dungeon’s within miles of Andrea and Matt during the very taping. Among these were black human rights activist Dr. Elias Biscet, who attempted Gandhi’s and Martin Luther King’s tactics of non-violent civil disobedience against Cuba’s very violent regime and suffers daily tortures for the effort, as confirmed by Amnesty International. The Paris-based Reporters without Borders documents that almost 20 percent of the world’s jailed journalists (Matt and Andrea’s colleagues, you might think) languish in Cuba’s (a nation of 11 million!) prisons. Many of these jailed journalists suffered in dungeons within walking distance of where Matt and Andrea were yukking it up with their jailers and urging their viewers to “come on down!” — and thus further reward, enrich, and entrench these jailers and torturers.

It was fascinating to watch Matt and Andrea decrying an implacable “U.S. blockade” of Cuba during a show from Cuba where the backdrop consisted of smiling tourists from all over the world (including the U.S.) holding up signs and waving.

It was also fascinating to hear Andrea, wife of former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman (and early Ayn Rand disciple) Alan Greenspan, explain that Communist economics has nothing to do with Cuba’s crumbling buildings. Instead, that “U.S. embargo” is the culprit. For the record, for close to a decade now, the U.S. has been Cuba’s number-one food supplier and 4th-biggest partner, while Cuba trades with every nation on earth.

As Andrea and Matt spoke from Havana, trade delegations from 24 of the 52 United States were also in Havana attending a trade fair and signing trade deals with the Stalinist torturers. The only thing the so-called embargo mandates nowadays is that Cuba’s military robber-barons pay U.S. vendors up front in cash. No credit. (Moody’s refuses to even rate Cuba, who has stiffed virtually her every creditor to date.)

So it was fascinating to hear the wife of one of the world’s most famous and powerful economists imply that paint, cement, and spackle are available only in the U.S. and somehow not available with payments of cash.

One exchange between Andrea and Matt was particularly fascinating: “You often hear Cuban-Americans saying, When Fidel is gone, we’re heading back to Cuba,’” says Lauer. “‘We’re going to reclaim our property, what was taken away from us.’ And actually that is a fear of the Cuban people here.”

Mitchell: “Sure. They’re afraid of it. That is quite a legitimate fear, given the rhetoric coming out of some Cuban-Americans in Miami.”

Poll after poll after poll of Cuban-Americans makes hash of this “Today Show” nonsense. Eighty percent of Cuban-Americans consistently reject Andrea’s and Matt’s contrived “revanchism.” But for the sake of argument, let’s go ahead and consider that other 20 percent.

Now, let’s say that Andrea’s and Matt’s Beemers were to disappear one night while parked in Georgetown or on Broadway. Now let’s say that the thieves were rounded up. We’d certainly look for NBC reporting how, given the hysterical rhetoric from Andrea and Matt about desiring the return of their possessions, these thieves had “a legitimate fear” that those Beemers would be “reclaimed” by the greedy Mr. Lauer and the revanchist and avaricious Ms. Mitchell.

While Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez has long viewed criticism of his autocratic rule and growing abuses as part of the impending Yanqui invasion, he has suffered two significant blows in the past week and the United States was not part of either. The developments are further signs that Chávez is finally being understood as an anti-democratic strongman who consistently supports terrorist groups that the rest of the world shuns.
 
The most recent blow came from a Spanish judge who linked the Chávez government to support for the Basque terrorist organization ETA, as well as the Colombian FARC, in attempts to assassinate senior Colombian officials.
 
The allegations, made in a court document by investigating magistrate Eloy Velasco, said that the Chávez government had acted as an intermediary between Eta and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) guerrilla group.
 
“There is evidence in this case which shows the Venezuelan government’s co-operation in the illegal association between Farc and Eta,” the magistrate said as he issued international arrest warrants for six alleged Eta members and seven Colombians believed to be members of Farc.
 
At the center of the controversy is Arturo Cubillas, an alleged Eta member who works in Venezuela’s ministry of agriculture, who was named as the main link among the three groups: the Venezuelan government, FARC and ETA. Cubillas, who has lived in Venezuela since 1989, is married to a senior member of Chávez’s government.
 
The allegations appeared to confirm Colombian intelligence reports that the FARC and ETA have worked together often and exchanged technological know-how and training.
 
The judge said that two Farc members, Victor Vargas and Gustavo Navarro, had travelled to Spain twice to identify possible targets among the Colombian community for assassination.
 
He said the Farc members had relied on Eta for support during their visit, and attempts had also been made to find a way of killing President Alvaro Uribe during a visit to Spain.
 
The investigating magistrate said that up to half a dozen Eta members had travelled to Venezuela to train Farc members in the use of C4 explosives and mobile telephones as detonators.
 
Members of the Venezuelan armed forces appeared to have accompanied them on at least one occasion, he added.
 
He also said that several Eta members had also travelled through Venezuela to Farc camps in Colombia to receive training there.
 
The other, earlier incident was sparked by an unusually blunt 300 page blistering report by the human rights branch of the normally-timid Organization of American States documenting the multiple and ongoing abuses of the Chávez government.
 
The report asserts that the state has punished critics, including anti-government television stations, demonstrators and opposition politicians who advocate a form of government different from Chávez’s, which is allied with Cuba and favors state intervention in the economy.
 
The report outlines how, after 11 years in power, Chávez holds tremendous influence over other branches of government, particularly the judiciary. Judges who issue decisions the government does not like can be fired, the report says, and hundreds of others are in provisional posts where they can easily be removed.
 
The commission said some adversaries of the government who have been elected to office, such as Caracas Mayor Antonio Ledezma, have seen their powers usurped by Chávez.
 
“The threats to human rights and democracy are many and very serious, and that’s why we published the report,” Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, a member of the commission who specializes in Venezuela, said by phone from his home in Brazil.
 
In both cases, Chávez reacted as he has in the past – by threatening, blustering, and personally attacking those documented his abuses, rather than substantively addressing any of the allegations. He shares this characteristic with Rafael Correa and Evo Morales, who, rather than debate the merits or truth of any criticism simply attack the messenger.
 
But slowly the mask is slipping on the creator of 21st century Socialism. Rather than ushering in a new era of poverty reduction, social justice and prosperity, he is presiding over an increasingly criminalized state with one of the highest murder rates in the world, rampant corruption and shrinking freedoms. Viva la revolución!

The embed was just disabled so check out the VIDEO here

By Mail Foreign Service

Venezuela’s president Hugo Chavez has accused his adversaries of sabotaging the country’s electricity grid as part of a broader plan aimed at bringing about the system’s collapse – and his downfall.

Chavez said authorities must be ‘on the alert’ and apprehend anyone who cuts electricity cables connected to the grid.

Such sabotage has caused power failures in some regions and exacerbated the effects of severe energy shortages, he claimed.

Chavez ‘On the alert’: Hugo Chavez at his weekly TV and radio programme today

‘Be on the lookout. Patrols must be carried out to capture the saboteurs because those responsible must be caught and put in prison,’ Chavez said during his weekly television and radio programme.

Referring to his government’s adversaries, he said: ‘They think that’s how they’re going to topple Chavez and that’s what they’re seeking, but if there’s an electricity collapse, it won’t be Chavez who is going to fall. Prepare yourselves, bourgeois folks, because it will be you who will fall.’

The accusations were vague and Chavez provided no evidence supporting them. Energy Minister Ali Rodriguez echoed the allegations.

He said: ‘I have no doubt that many of the failures that are occurring are the product of sabotage. We are investigating.’

Opposition leaders scoffed at the president’s claim, saying Mr Chavez was trying to shed the blame for power shortages that critics say his government caused by failing to invest enough in electricity production over the last decade.

ChavezChavez waves to supporters on a tractor as he arrives at a ceremony to commemorate 151 years of the Federal Revolution in Caracas

‘The president is a great manipulator and he uses lies to fool the people,’ Juan Jose Molina, an opposition politician, said.

He noted more than a dozen projects to build thermoelectric plants had been delayed. ‘It’s Chavez’s own incompetence that’s going to bring him down,’ said Mr Molina. ‘We want to get him out with votes.’

Mr Chavez declared an energy emergency earlier this month, announcing that his socialist government would punish businesses and industries using ‘excessive’ amounts of electricity.

He promised discounts to those which reduced consumption. Under the plan, large businesses and factories must cut electricity consumption 20 per cent or face sanctions, including hefty surcharges on electricity bills.

The energy-saving initiative also targets ordinary Venezuelans who use more than 500 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month, an estimated 24 per cent of all residential consumers, according to Chavez.

The plan is aimed at easing energy shortages which Mr Chavez blames on a drought lasting several months.

The lack of rain has caused water levels to drop to critical lows behind the Guri Dam, which supplies roughly 70 per cent of Venezuela’s electricity.

By Tom Harper

He is a superstar lauded for his commitment to human rights and passionate defence of Brazil’s rainforests.

But Sting has been labelled ‘a hypocrite’ after playing at a concert in Uzbekistan organised by the brutal regime of Islam Karimov.

Enemies of the 72-year-old dictator have been shot in the street and a former British ambassador to the ex-Soviet state even accused him of boiling alive his political opponents.

Sting with Gulnara Karimova at the fashion show in Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Ruler’s girl: Sting with Gulnara Karimova at the fashion show in Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Yet according to reports by two of the few remaining independent Uzbek media organisations, Sting, 58, accepted up to £2million to sing for Gulnara Karimova, the despot’s glamorous daughter and anointed heir.

Uznews.net and Eurasia.net claim the former Police frontman sold out the National Opera House in the capital, Tashkent, in October last year. Tickets went for £1,400 – 45 times the average local monthly salary.

One report said huge screens were erected outside the venue to show the concert to thousands unable to buy a ticket. It was the highlight of a week-long festival organised by Ms Karimova’s Forum of Culture and Arts of Uzbekistan Foundation.

Uzbek President Islam Karimov
Despot: Gulnara’s father, the Uzbek President Islam Karimov

Britain’s ex-ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray said: ‘It appears Sting is a hypocrite. He’s incredibly stupid to be unaware of what sort of regime it is. His human rights and environmental activism seem to have flown out the window.’

Ex-Communist official Karimov, who came to power in 1989, has locked up 6,000 people who have dared to question his rule.

In 2005, the army slaughtered hundreds who protested against poverty and corruption in the city of Andizhan. And thousands of children are used as slave labour in huge state cotton plantations.

Sting has been a tireless Amnesty International activist for 30 years, yet just last week, the organisation criticised the conviction in Uzbekistan of film-maker Umida Akhmedova for a documentary exposing how the country’s women have to prove their virginity on their wedding night.

The concert is also at odds with Sting’s long-standing eco-activism. The Aral Sea was once the world’s fourth biggest lake but has lost 80 per cent of its volume thanks in part to the Karimov regime’s intense irrigation of desert-based cotton fields.

Analysts say Western stars are invited to boost domestic support for the dictatorship.

Real Madrid soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo flew to Tashkent in December to meet Ms Karimova, 37, who owns the country’s largest football club, Bunyodkor, where ex-Chelsea boss Luiz Felipe Scolari is the world’s highest-paid manager on £16 million a year.

Singers Rod Stewart and Julio Iglesias have also recently played there .

A European diplomat said: ‘This is a strategy to give credibility to a government with blood on its hands. It’s a personal initiative of Ms Karimova, presumably linked to her ambitions to succed her father.’

In a statement, Sting said: ‘I played in Uzbekistan a few months ago. The concert was organized by the president’s daughter and I believe sponsored by Unicef.

‘I supported wholeheartedly the cultural boycott of South Africa under the apartheid regime because it was a special case and specifically targeted the younger demographic of the ruling white middle class.

‘I am well aware of the Uzbek president’s appalling reputation in the field of human rights as well as the environment. I made the decision to play there in spite of that.

‘I have come to believe that cultural boycotts are not only pointless gestures, they are counter-productive, where proscribed states are further robbed of the open commerce of ideas and art and as a result become even more closed, paranoid and insular.

‘I seriously doubt whether the President of Uzbekistan cares in the slightest whether artists like myself come to play in his country, he is hermetically sealed in his own medieval, tyrannical mindset.’

Ms Karimova’s spokeswoman did not return calls.

 The Denver Post

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday refused the request of former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega to block his extradition to France, where he faces drug charges similar to those that have kept him in a U.S. prison.

The court gave no reason for turning down the appeal, and Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia objected. They said the case of Noriega, the only person being held as a prisoner of war by the United States, raises important questions about how the courts should handle cases arising from the government’s attempt to prosecute terrorists.

"Providing that guidance in this case would allow us to say what the law is without the unnecessary delay and other complications that could burden a decision on these questions in Guantanamo or other detainee litigation arising out of the conflict with al-Qaeda," Thomas wrote.

Noriega was ousted after the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989. He was convicted of drug racketeering and other charges in 1992 and was sentenced to prison. The judge in that trial also declared him a prisoner of war.

Just before his sentence ended in 2007, the United States filed papers supporting France’s request that he be extradited there to face drug charges. Courts there had convicted him in absentia, but France promised a new trial.

Noriega contended the Geneva Conventions meant that prisoners of war had to be returned to their home countries. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said federal law did not allow Noriega to rely on the treaties to challenge the extradition, and that is the ruling the Supreme Court decided not to review.

The case is Noriega vs. Pastrana.

CARACAS, Venezuela—Venezuelan cable-television providers stopped transmitting a channel critical of President Hugo Chávez on Sunday, after the government cited noncompliance with new regulations requiring the socialist leader’s speeches be televised on cable.

Radio Caracas Television, an anti-Chávez channel known as RCTV that switched to cable and satellite television in 2007 after the government refused to renew its over-the-air license, disappeared from TV sets shortly after midnight.

RCTV was yanked from cable and satellite programming just hours after Diosdado Cabello, director of Venezuela’s state-run telecommunications agency, said several local channels carried by cable television have breached broadcasting laws and should be removed from the airwaves.

Mr. Cabello warned cable operations on Saturday evening that they could find themselves in jeopardy if they keep showing those channels.

"They must comply with the law, and they cannot have a single channel that violates Venezuelan laws as part of their programming," he said. Several channels haven’t shown Mr. Chávez’s televised speeches when he orders all media to air them–a requirement under new regulations approved last month by the telecommunications agency, Mr. Cabello said. RCTV didn’t broadcast a speech by the president to his political supporters during a rally early on Saturday.

The station’s removal from cable and satellite television prompted a cacophony of protests in Caracas neighborhoods as Chavez opponents leaned out apartment windows to bang on pots and pans. Others shouted epithets and drivers joined in, honking car horns.

"They want to silence RCTV’s voice," said Miguel Angel Rodriguez, the channel’s most popular talk-show host. "But they won’t be able to because RCTV is embedded in the hearts of all Venezuelans."

The U.S. Embassy in Caracas expressed concern about the decision. "Access to information is a cornerstone of democracy and provides a foundation for global progress. By restricting yet again the Venezuelan people’s access to RCTV broadcasts, the Venezuelan government continues to erode this cornerstone," embassy spokeswoman Robin Holzhauer said.

Venezuela’s telecommunications agency has said in the past week that under new rules, two dozen local cable channels including RCTV must carry government programming when officials deem the measure necessary, just like channels on the open airwaves already do. Mr. Chávez often uses the measure to force all the country’s TV channels and radio stations to broadcast his speeches.

Mr. Cabello said Saturday that other violations committed by cable channels include failing to warn viewers of sexual and violent content as well as broadcasting more than two hours of soap operas during the afternoon, which should be mostly dedicated to children programming.

He didn’t specify which TV channels have purportedly violated the law, but RCTV said it was the target. It accused the agency of pressuring cable providers to drop channels that are critical of the government.

The agency "doesn’t have any authority to give the cable service providers this order," RCTV said in a statement. "The government is inappropriately pressuring them to make decisions beyond their responsibilities."

In denying RCTV a renewal of its over-the-air broadcast license, Mr. Chávez accused the station of plotting against his government and supporting a failed 2002 coup. In August, Mr. Chávez’s government forced 32 radio stations and two small TV stations off the air, saying some owners had failed to renew their broadcast licenses while other licenses were no longer valid because they had been granted long ago to owners who are now dead. Officials said they planned to take more stations off the air.

Government figures say that as of 2008 about 37% of Venezuelan homes received cable television.

Source

By Georgina Littlejohn

She’s just been named one-half of the richest couple in showbiz… and perhaps here’s why.

Beyoncé appears unable to say no to any gig – even when the host is the leering son of a Middle-Eastern despot – if a reputed $2m is on the table.

And so the stunning chart-topper found herself performing hits in a leotard on a tiny stage in tacky surroundings on New Year’s Eve in the Caribbean island of St Barts.

In pictures which emerged on the day she and super-producer husband Jay-Z were named the highest-earning entertainers in the world by Forbes magazine, she can be seen strutting and kneeling  before Muatsim Gaddafi.

Beyonce

Happy New Year: Beyonce performs on stage in St Barts for a New Year’s Eve party thrown by the son of Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi

Beyonce

Party animals: At a table full of drinks, Muatsim Gaddafi (R), watches Beyonce perform as his friend cheers in delight

Muatsim Gaddafi

Muatsim Gaddafi enjoys a smoke as he watches his $2m headliner

The sparkly leotard slashed to reveal sections of her tummy and cleavage is so very Beyoncé, but it’s hard to envisage Hollywood’s highest-earner plying her trade in a tawdry setting resembling a cheap lapdancing club.

Certainly Muatsim Gaddafi, the third son of the Libyan leader Muammar-al Gaddafi, couldn’t take his eyes off the Crazy In Love star as she gyrated and sang in front of him, his friends and other partygoers, including her businessman rapper husband Jay-Z.

Gaddafi smokes cigarettes, knocks back drinks and laughs with guests including Jon Bon Jovi, Usher and pretty, young female guests.

Beyoncé is believed to have been paid $2m fee for her performance at his private party at Nikki Beach on the Caribbean island – although that amoung was not even required to help  them top the Forbes magazine list.

Jay-Z and Beyoncé picked up an astonishing $110m (£68m) between June 2008 and June 2009.

Beyoncé’s huge earnings stem from her I Am…Sasha Fierce world tour from March to June 2009 which raked in $14m, an extra $4m in sponsorship and $21million from album sales alone.

Jay-Z, dubbed the King of Rap, contributed his millions to the partnership through his record label, clothing line and movie production company as well as his music – he headlined Glastonbury – and also signed a $150million ten-year, three-album deal with live events company Live Nation.

Beyonce

Rock ‘n’ roll diva: Beyonce gyrates and struts her stuff on the makeshift stage at the Nikki Beach club in St Barts

A-listers Harrison Ford and Calista Flockhart were way back in second spot with £42m and Brad Pitt and Angeline Jolie only third with £33m. Will Smith and Jada Pinkett-Smith were fourth with £29m.

While many fans will find the sight of the star performing at such a sleazy gig offensive, they will be doubly so for relatives of Lockerbie bomb victims.

In 2003, Colonel Gaddafi finally admitted Libya was responsible for bringing down the Pan Am Flight 103 en route to New York in 1988, killing all 243 passengers and 16 crew members plus 11 people on the ground.

Gaddafi gave a hero’s welcome to the only man convicted in connection with the incident, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, when he was released from a Scottish jail last August on compassionate grounds when a Libyan doctor provided evidence that he was dying.

Gaddafi has ruled Libya since 1969 when, as a 27-year-old military officer, he staged a bloodless coup d’etat against King Idris I.

Beyonce

Not So Single Lady: Beyonce points to her wedding band to show she’s not, as she performs her hit single All The Single Ladies (Put A Ring On It)

Muatsim is seen as a possible successor to his father as Libya’s leader.

He was once a Lieutenant Colonel in the Libyan Army but fled to Egypt after allegedly masterminding an Egyptian backed coup attempt against his father.

Gaddafi forgave him and he returned to Libya where he now holds the post of national security adviser and heads his own unit within the army.

Another of his sons, Moutassim, nicknamed Hannibal, was involved in an incident at Claridge’s Hotel in London on Christmas Day when police were called to his £4,000-a-night suite.

Three of security guards were arrested and his wife, Aline Skaf, was taken to hospital with a broken nose. She later claimed that her injuries were the result of an accidental fall.

Beyonce

Happy New Year: Beyonce performed five of her classic songs to the partygoers, which including her husband Jay-Z

However, Hannibal has previous for violence against women. In 2005, he was arrested in a Paris hotel for punching a woman and was given a four-month suspended sentence and a £350 fine for assault and in 2008, he was held in police custody in Switzerland for two days for allegedly beating up his servants.

Beyoncé and Jay-Z have also been among U.S. President Barack Obama’s biggest celebrity supporters and their willingness to be linked to the Gaddafi clan after the Libyan leaders long hostility to the U.S. will come as a surprise in America.

A spokesman for Beyoncé has so far refused to comment on either the New Year’s Eve bash or the couple’s relationship with Mr Gaddafi.

By Humberto Fontova

To say that from 1957-59, America’s liberal elites were smitten with Fidel Castro seriously understates their infatuation with the communist dictator. And now, with the advent of his brother Raul’s regime, both the liberal media and the Obama administration seem to be back on the same path their forebears ran down headlong.

And I’m proud to say that HUMAN EVENTS was right about Castro from the beginning.  As history will prove we are today.  

How lovely was Fidel?  A little sampling of the adoration heaped on him shows.  

"Fidel Castro is humanist, a man of many ideals including those of liberty, democracy and social justice. This amounts to a new deal for Cuba, radical, democratic and therefore anti-Communist." (New York Times. Feb. 1957.)

“Castro is honest, and an honest government is something unique in Cuba. Castro is not himself even remotely a Communist.” (Newsweek, April 1959)

“We can thank our lucky stars Castro is no Communist,” (Look Magazine, March 1959)

“The Cuba of Fidel Castro is free from terror. Civil liberties have been restored. These are large steps forward, and they were made against fearful odds.” (Readers Digest April 1959)

"It would be a great mistake even to intimate that Castro’s Cuba has any real prospect of becoming a Soviet satellite." (Walter Lippmann, Washington Post July, 1959)

“Fidel Castro is a good young man trying to do what’s best for Cuba. We should extend him a hand." (retired president Harry Truman July, 1959)

At one point in 1958, in order to accommodate the adoring U.S. media multitudes, Castro and Che’s camp in the Sierra Madre mountains actually had a big, bright sign reading: "PRESS HUT." By that time reporters (male and female, young and decrepit) from Look to Life to Boy’s Life had all made the "terrifying" trek to obtain an interview with the Cuban George Washington/Robin Hood/St. Thomas Aquinas/Davy Crockett.

But whoops! Amidst the overwhelming adulation, one Beltway media source begged to differ:

"Fidel Castro was a ringleader in a bloody uprising in Bogota, Colombia in April 1948," started the HUMAN EVENTS article on August 17th 1957. "That uprising was engineered and staged by communists. The Colombian government subsequently published documentary evidence of Fidel Castro’s role as a leader. The appearance of this Cuban at the head of the uprising in his own country stamps his insurrection as Communist.”

And, of course, anything resembling such principled conservatism did not sit well with enlightened parties of the time.

Fast forward to February 2008 and Fidel’s “succession” by baby brother Raul. NPR gathered the Beltway’s darling academic and media “Cuba Experts” for a program to showcase their expert prognostications:

“Raul Castro represents potential change. He will have to seek an improvement for Cubans’ standard of living. He has also signed two human rights accords,” (Marifeli Perez-Stable, V. Pres. at Washington D.C’s Inter-American Dialogue, Florida International Univ. professor, Miami Herald contributing editor.)

“This is a time when Cuba’s leadership moves toward generational change. It’s Carlos Lage for Cuba’s next President.” (Phil Peters, vice president of Washington D.C’s Lexington Institute, often quoted and published in the Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal AP, Reuters, etc. etc. etc.)

"Raúl Castro said in recent months that he has an obligation not only to lead but also to yield to a younger generation of leaders. (Julia Sweig, Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America Studies and Director for Latin America Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.)

“Castro is now going out on his own terms, securing a smooth transition to his brother and to a younger generation of leadership in Cuba such as Vice President Carlos Lage." (Peter Kornbluh, director of The National Security Archive at Washington D.C’s George Washington University)

Not to be outdone, after a visit to Cuba early last year the gentleman from Indiana, Republican Senator Richard Lugar, stressed the following in a letter to president Obama “It is clear that the recent leadership changes in Cuba have created an opportunity for the United States to reevaluate a complex relationship marked by misunderstanding, suspicion, and open hostility."

(Carlos Lage, by the way, vanished from the Cuban leadership scene almost a year ago and appears to be either in prison or under house arrest.)

Last month Human Rights Watch issued a report they describe as "our most comprehensive analysis of conditions for Cuba since Raúl Castro took power.” Its titled New Castro/ Same Cuba. “Raúl Castro’s government has used draconian laws and sham trials to incarcerate scores of people who have dared to exercise their fundamental freedoms," it summarizes. “Rather than dismantle this repressive machinery, Raúl Castro has kept it firmly in place and fully active.”

A recent Samizdat by Elizardo Sanchez, President of the (dissident) Cuban Commission on Human Rights, reports: "The wave of repression we witnessed on Dec. 10th is the worst we’ve seen in this country in decades." The smuggled report details how during an attempted march commemorating “Universal Human Rights Day,” on Dec. 19th, hundreds of Cubans were arrested and/or beaten by regime goons. Sanchez also has testimonies from at least five people who were injected in their buttocks by these goons. "The injections produce dizziness and nausea…this is something totally new in terms of regime repression," stressed Sanchez. “The regime is in a panic right now. The international community must hear of this!”

So according to those cursed by fate to live under Cuba’s Stalinist regime, things have actually worsened under Raul-rule. In 2009’s Index of Economic Freedom, The Heritage Foundation had already found Cuba as more economically repressive under Raul than under Fidel. Under Raul rule’s, Cuba slipped down 1.1 notches to number 155 where it ranks almost neck to neck with North Korea.

We turn now to a HUMAN EVENTS article from February 21, 2008 on the succession from Fidel to Raul in which we prognosticated: "Neither of the Castros come close in ideological outlook to a Deng or Gorbachev. So wazzup for Cuba under Raul?

SSDD:  same stuff, different dictator.

———————————-

Mr. Fontova is the author of Fidel: Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant

Next Page »