All Posts


Mugshot

Illustration: Iranian bomb by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times

By Alan Caruba–The Washington Times

As a child in the 1950s, I learned how to “duck and cover” in order to protect myself from an atomic bomb explosion. Little did I know the instruction should have been, “Kiss your asterisk goodbye.”

The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the Soviets wanted to put nuclear-tipped long-range missiles there, led to a confrontation between President Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev that had both sides changing their underwear after it was over.

What do the United States, Great Britain, France, Russia, Pakistan, India, Israel and North Korea have in common? They all have nuclear weapons, and, of course, Iran has been working toward that goal and is very close to achieving it.

Some will argue that Israel should not be on the list because it has never acknowledged its nuclear capabilities, but everyone knows it has them. Presumably, the Iranian mullahs know that as well, but they are waiting for the mythical 12th Imam to come out of a well and smite the enemies of Islam and, in their view, a catastrophic exchange of nuclear weapons might help that occur.

It is instructive that both Pakistan and India acquired their nuclear weapons without anyone being aware of it until after the fact. At CIA headquarters, when India announced its successful test, it came as a very big surprise. These days, the United States is busy reassuring Israel that Iran is “at least a year away” from nuclear status, and you can imagine how relieved they are to hear that.

North Korea is a wild card, and, given the lack of success the United States or anyone else has had in getting it to abandon its nukes, the same can be assumed for Iran when it makes its announcement. Meanwhile, it has to content itself with announcing new missiles, the latest of which it has dubbed the “ambassador of death.”

The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization designated last Sunday as the International Day Against Nuclear Tests. Given the total lack of success in thwarting any nation that wants a nuke, my confidence in the United Nations’ treaty is zero.

The International Atomic Energy Agency, a U.N. component, has been kicked out of North Korea, Iraq and Iran on several occasions, so one might rationally assume it is useless when it comes to stopping the manufacture of A-bombs.

Olli Heinonen, the former chief of U.N. nuclear inspections worldwide, told the French newspaper Le Monde that Iran has stockpiled enough low-enriched uranium for one or two nuclear arms, but he thought doing so made no sense. Betting on the rationality of the Iranian ayatollahs is not a good idea.

Who doesn’t want a ban on nuclear weapons testing? The U.S. Senate, for one.

While the U.S. has “signed” a number of the test-ban treaties that have been around since the 1960s, the Senate has not ratified any of them lately, thus avoiding having to commit the nation to no longer testing new nuclear weapons. For some reason, the Senate does not trust Russia or the other nuke nations.

In April, President Obama journeyed to Russia to sign a nuclear arms reduction treaty dubbed New START with Dmitry Medvedev.

Robert R. Monroe, a retired vice admiral in the U.S. Navy and former director of the Defense Nuclear Agency from 1977 to 1980, expressed the opinion, “The treaty has many problems from being unverifiable to giving Russia virtual veto power over U.S. missile defense, and more.” That’s bad enough, but it’s worse than that.

Two days before meeting with the Russians, the Obama administration released its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Adm. Monroe said, “The NPR is joined at the hip with New START, and together they take this country down a dangerous path. For 65 years, the very existence of our nation has depended upon a strong nuclear deterrent. The new NPR wipes out this proven policy, substituting one of weakness in its place.”

There are those who love test-ban treaties. They love the idea of unilaterally disarming the United States in a world where there are nations that may not love us.

Not surprisingly, the nations with nukes have not signed onto anything that would take away their deterrent factor, and, of course, Iran is hellbent on getting nukes for itself.

Not a single conflict since the United States dropped two A-bombs on Japan in 1945 to end a war the Japanese had started has used nuclear weapons. Rational people – even if they have nuclear weapons – know that using them is probably suicidal. Irrational people – like the Iranian ayatollahs – probably are the exception.

It appears that the GOP — with the help of the Tea Parties, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, and the Devil — is out to revise the 14th Amendment to the point of meaninglessness. Maybe even write the amendment out of the Constitution itself — if not discard the Constitution completely. And all so that poor foreign newborns, who have never hurt a fly, won’t be awarded with free American citizenship upon first seeing the light of day. Makes you sick, doesn’t it? Continue Reading

Kyle Smith

Left and right can agree on something: America is freakin’ doomed.

Our military-political empire is crumbling, the Union is falling apart, America’s wealthy period is a fading memory (duh) and our political spatting is about to go all Gettysburg.

How do I know all this? Not just from TV and radio blowhards, but from respected analysts. Many of whom have actually gotten these notions printed between hard covers, by major publishers.

Canada — can I crash with you for the next few decades? America is turning into “The Road.”

This year, the liberal Southern Poverty Law Center, which is to “hate groups” what Gen. Jack T. Ripper of “Dr. Strangelove” was to flouridation, warns that these sinister bands are at “record levels.” More Oklahoma City bombing-style violence is coming, it says, because “we are in the midst of one of the most significant right-wing populist rebellions in United States history.”

A conservative writer, Lee Harris, evokes similar imagery in his new book, “The Next American Civil War: The Populist Revolt Against the Liberal Elite”: “Once resistance against authority has reached a certain point, it becomes difficult to keep it in check. Eventually a point of no return is reached, when all efforts to govern the society are baffled, so that no other options remain except revolution and civil war.”

Jeez, no other options? I just wanted to attend a lunch-hour rally while wearing a funny tricorn hat.

House Minority Leader John Boehner said passage of the health-care law would be “Armageddon.” This usage is a sarcrilege. Let us not trifle with a consecrated term that should be used only in its proper context: Def Leppard’s “Armageddon It.” (Refrain: “Are you gettin’ it? Armageddon it!”)

There’s a (left-wing) secessionist movement in Vermont. There’s a (right-wing) secessionist movement in Texas. Proposal: Grant them both of their wishes — but only as a joint entity. Oil, maple syrup. What’s the difference? Bernie Sanders and George W. Bush can do joint ads for the new nation of Texmont’s tourism bureau: “You can have my vegan granola when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.”

Where is the perspective on all of this? The idea of the coming American disaster is even more enduring than the American disaster movie. Today’s fears of the Tea Party/the Fed/Halliburton are just Mad Libs substitutes for 19th-century denunciations of the pope/the gold standard/the Freemasons.

In his 1964 Harper’s essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” Richard Hofstadter wrote that the depression of 1893 “was alleged to be an international creation of the Catholics who began it by starting a run on the banks. Some spokesmen of the movement circulated a bogus encyclical attributed to Leo XIII instructing American Catholics on a certain date in 1893 to exterminate all heretics, and a great many anti-Catholics daily expected a nationwide uprising. The myth of an impending Catholic war of mutilation and extermination of heretics persisted into the twentieth century.”

Despite his title, though, Hofstadter concluded that “the paranoid style is not confined to a particular country and time. It is an international phenomenon.” Those disaster movies may be American-made, but they’re internationally beloved. “Armagaddeon,” “Deep Impact,” “Independence Day,” “2012” and their kin sold most of their tickets overseas. Humanity seems to have an unhealthy fascination with the end of the world, with wars and Rapture and worst-case scenarios.

These are troubled times, but even now — or perhaps especially — it’s not optimism that sells. Americans like to be warned that this will only end in tears, then be pleasantly surprised when we survive to brood another day.

Story Here

El Paso Times

CARACAS, Venezuela—A Venezuelan politician is holding an unusual raffle to raise campaign cash. The grand prize: breast implants. For a little under $6 a ticket, donors get the chance to win the pricey operation free of charge.

Breast enlargement is widely popular in image-conscious Venezuela. In recent years as many as 30,000 women have had the operation annually, according to the nation’s Plastic Surgery Society.

Gustavo Rojas, who is running as an alternate for the National Assembly in Sept. 26 elections, said there is a great demand for the surgery.

The prize for his fund-raising effort may be a little unusual, Rojas conceded Friday, but he said it’s like raffling off a TV set or a telephone.

———————————————————–

One of these things is not like the other…

Flat Screen T.V.

Slim-line Telephone

Breast Implants

NewsFirst5

The Pentagon has told Colorado Secretary of State Bernie Buescher that it has denied a waiver to exempt the state from a federal requirement to mail ballots to military service members overseas 45 days before the November election.

Spokesman Rich Coolidge confirmed that Colorado’s waiver request has been denied. There was no word from the Secretary of State on how he would respond.

Coolidge said before the ruling that the ballots will still be mailed. He said if the state still cannot meet the deadline, some soldiers in remote battlefields might not have enough time to return them even though the state will give them an extra seven days after the election.

KGUN9

By JEFF KAROUB
Associated Press Writer

DETROIT (AP) – More than 1,000 documents, including some dating back to the beginning of the Nation of Islam, were found in the attic of a home in Detroit, the city where the secretive movement started 80 years ago, a lawyer said.

Attorney Gregory Reed unveiled some documents, letters and a booklet Thursday at a Detroit mosque, including a rare 1933 signature of Nation of Islam founder W.D. Fard. Reed said the well-preserved documents detail the early structure and teachings of the group founded on the ideals of black nationalism.

“Very few have seen the internal workings of how (the Nation of Islam) was put together,” said Reed, whose Keeper of the Word Foundation oversees collections and exhibits that include the works of Malcolm X, Rosa Parks and Nelson Mandela.

He said the boxes which also included detailed literature about the early movement’s educational and leadership training were recently discovered by an unidentified man whose family members were Nation of Islam “pioneers.” Reed said he was contacted by the family, which owns the home, because of his work with other collections.

Reed described another piece as a “manifesto” handwritten by Fard that became required reading for Nation of Islam members through the 1950s. It was not displayed at the mosque, remaining instead with the vast majority of artifacts remaining in a vault.

He said the material has been reviewed and appraised by several collectors and auctioneers he didn’t name. A foundation set up by the family in association with Keeper of the Word controls the rights to the collection.

Reed said officials with the Chicago-based Nation of Islam are aware of the documents and Reed’s plans to publicly display them at a proposed center in Detroit. He said the family is working with him on plans for the “W.D. Fard Founder’s Center,” which they hope to jointly announce within 60 days.

Messages left Friday by The Associated Press for top leaders of the Nation of Islam were not immediately returned.

Lawrence Mumiya, a Vassar College professor of religion and Africana studies, said the documents should be most revealing and rewarding for scholars and others outside the movement. He said the Nation of Islam has a significant collection that isn’t shared with nonmembers.

“I think this trove of 1,000 documents is very important for scholarship and for the writing of the history of the Nation,” he said. “It won’t change much for the Nation itself, but it may change things for people like myself who have never seen these documents.”

Fard attracted black Detroiters on the margins of society with a message of self-improvement and separation from whites. Fard said whites were inherently evil because of their enslavement of blacks.

The Nation of Islam was rebuilt by Farrakhan in the late 1970s after W.D. Mohammed, the son of longtime leader Elijah Mohammed, broke away and moved many followers toward mainstream Islam.

The Nation of Islam continues to be led by Farrakhan, who has haltingly moved toward mainstream Islam but maintains a separatist ideology.

Nation of Islam members traditionally have believed that God came in the form of Fard; Islam recognizes only one God.

In the past, Farrakhan’s most inflammatory comments have included referring to Judaism as a “gutter religion” and calling Adolf Hitler “wickedly great.” Farrakhan has over the years denied claims of anti-Semitism, arguing his remarks are often taken out of context and that criticism of Jews in any light automatically earns the “anti-Semite” label.

A longtime target of federal surveillance, the movement is highly secretive. Even researchers who follow the group closely do not know how many members or mosques it has, or how much money it makes.

By S.E. Cupp – The Daily Caller  

One of the many benefits of being Italian is that colorful stories from the “old country” trickle over to the states from time to time through relatives, friends and helpful paesani.

My uncle recently regaled me with just such a yarn, told to him by some Italian business associates he sees regularly. The setting is picturesque Padua, nestled in the Veneto region of northern Italy, on the Bacchiglione River. Those of you who like to read fancy books know that Padua is also the setting for Shakespeare’s comedy “The Taming of the Shrew.” And it’s no coincidence — my uncle’s story sounds like just the kind of tale the Bard would have written if he’d lived long enough. It goes something like this:

A group of Muslims wanted to build a mosque. They got all the permits and permissions they needed, but the Padovani townsfolk wanted no part of it. After months of arguing over religious freedoms and land rights, a crafty Catholic stole away in the dead of night, and paraded a well-trained pig around the site, who sprayed its urine as it ambled over the rocks and leveled gravel. Upon hearing of the curious midnight shower, the Muslims behind the mosque threw up their hands and said, “This ground is forever unclean,” and they packed up and moved on to another unsuspecting village, where the pigs had not yet heard of them.

Okay, so maybe it’s more Chaucer than Shakespeare, but you get the gist. Needless to say, I was skeptical, as was my uncle, but we both agreed it was a delightfully quaint way to solve a problem. I decided to look into it.

Turns out, there’s more truth there than mere farm animal fiction, and hardly something out of medieval times. In 2007, a woman named Mariella Mazzetto did indeed parade a pig on the site of a planned mosque in Padua. But she wasn’t just some local loony. She was the former Italian deputy Education Minister under Silvio Berlusconi, and member of the anti-immigrant Northern League Party, 10 other members of which joined in her pig protest.

And believe it or not, hers was not without precedent! A year earlier protesters left a pig’s head at a mosque site in Tuscany, and just a few months earlier Northern League senator Roberto Calderoli called for a “Pig Day” protest against mosque construction in Bologna. Apparently, it was a good time to be a pig in Italy (unless you were the one that ended up headless in Tuscany. I just hope someone made good use of its delicious pork belly).

In dealing with the country’s rising Muslim population, Italians all over the great boot were protesting planned mosques, if not always with the use of pig or pig byproducts. From Genoa to Colle di Val d’Elsa, Italians argued that mosques were symbols of occupation, or that building a mosque next to a church was improper, or that building mosques led to increases in crime outbreaks. And at least in Bologna, Italian authorities caved into to local pressure and dismissed the plans.
In the case of Padua, the Muslims behind that mosque remained defiant. “We believe in God, not in superstition,” said the local imam Kahlhil Boussuni. “And we intend to build our place of prayer and worship where only the faithful will be permitted to enter.” It appears, however, that for reasons either bureaucratic or political, the Padua mosque has not been built.

Mariella Mazzetto said she wasn’t racist or xenophobic, but trying to spark a debate. Which brings us to our current problem at Ground Zero, where Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf intends to “bring people together” – whether you like it or not.

The Padua story got me thinking. Maybe I’ll just bring a pig down to Ground Zero — it’s only 5 blocks from my house, and having lived through 9/11 I know the area well.

Like Ms. Mazzetto, I’m not motivated by racism or xenophobia. But I would like to make a point. See, every day this country’s most revered storytellers — Frank Rich, Keith Olbermann and Katie Couric — tell me that I’m Islamophobic for suggesting it’s insensitive to put a mosque near a cemetery where 2,000 innocent people were killed by Islamic terrorists. And they tell me I hate freedom because I’m just a little distrusting of a guy who thinks 9/11 was sort of our fault. And they tell me I’m intolerant because I think common sense and decency aren’t just vestigial organs we’ve evolved beyond.

The truth is, aside from belching at movies and occasionally puking in the streets on New Year’s, we’re far too polite a society to bring a pig to Ground Zero and gently nudge it to urinate on the site of an old Burlington Coat Factory building. And aside from our considerable distrust of bull’s testicles in olive oil and our preference for ice in our drinks, we’re far too tolerant a society to spike a pig’s head on a post in front of 51 Park Place.

The way we’ve handled the mosque has been to talk about it, the horror. And for that we are called Neanderthals and racists. President Obama, Michael Bloomberg, Nancy Pelosi and the liberal media don’t know what Islamophobia and intolerance actually look like. And maybe I should be the one to show them. Maybe then, after we’ve become a country where pigs urinate on buildings, and pig heads dot the countryside, they’ll realize just how good they had it.

By Benjamin Weinthal

On Monday the head of Finland’s branch of Amnesty International, Frank Johansson, termed Israel a “scum state.” Writing in his blog, which appears on the Web site of Iltalehti, one of Finland’s largest newspapers, he based his characterization of Israel on his “own visit[s], which occurred during the 1970s and for the last time in the 1990s.” Johansson further justified his rhetoric toward Israel because he has previously invoked strong language against former Pres. George Bush on Finnish TV. He called Mr. Bush “the biggest executioner in the Western Hemisphere.”

Turning Israel and the United States into whipping boys is hardly new territory among human-rights NGOs, but now a high-level official of AI has exposed his pathological obsession with rejecting Western democratic values. His biological language mirrors that of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who calls Israel a “cancer” that needs to be “removed.”

Once Johansson was caught with both hands deep in the anti-Semitic cookie jar, he offered the defense that “I am writing those [blogs] in my capacity as a private person, not as an Amnesty official.” However, on Iltalehti’s Web site, his title as “director of the Finnish branch of Amnesty International” appears above his blog.

Human-rights organizations such as the London-based Amnesty International and the U.S. Human Rights Watch have long developed a cottage industry of playing down repression of human rights in the Islamic world while devoting the bulk of their resources, energies, and personnel to soft targets such as Israel’s democracy. All of this helps to explain why Gita Sahgal, the former head of Amnesty International’s gender unit, deemed Amnesty’s leadership to be plagued by “ideological bankruptcy” and “misogyny.” Sahgal criticized Amnesty for giving a platform to Moazzam Begg, a leading advocate of the Taliban in the United Kingdom and former Guantánamo Bay prisoner. Sahgal was dismissed this past year for blowing the whistle on Amnesty’s alliance with radical Islam and haters of women.

It is a world beyond madness: Human rights animated by anti-Semitism and Taliban slaughterers of women.

Jeannie DeAngelis

The hate crime accusers are on the march.  What could be better then a WASP psychopath with one too many Budweisers under his cowboy belt slashing a Muslim cab driver just as the 9-11 mosque controversy came to a rolling boil in New York City?
Muslim cab driver Ahmed Sharif picked up a very thirsty American student and, as a result, one unsuspecting Muslim nearly became a statistic.

Apparently, after imbibing numerous alcoholic beverages, Michael Enright felt obligated to embark upon a personal Checkered Cab Crusade, slashing a taxicab driver in the neck and upper lip in what is being reported as an “explosion of anti-Muslim violence in the close confines of [a] New York City taxi.”

Is it fair to define one drunk and one Muslim as an “explosion of anti-Muslim violence?”  To date, an assemblage of tee-totaling Muslims killing 3,000+ Americans in an “explosion of anti-American violence” is yet to officially be labeled a religiously motivated “hate crime.”

Victim-cabdriver Ahmed shared the horror story: “I’m driving. He asked me where I’m from. I said Bangladesh. Second question he ask me, are you Muslim? I said yes. Then he tells me ‘assalamu alaikum,’” Sharif said. 

A pattern is emerging: Arabic terms like “Assalamu alaikum” and “Allahu akbar” seem to be the war cry of hate mongers as faraway from New York City as Ft. Hood, Texas.

Sharif said Enright began “ridiculing the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and then started a bizarre, belligerent rant.” Enright allegedly said, “This is checkpoint [expletive]. I have to put you down.”

Then the honor student/Afghanistan reporter from Putnam County “lunged through the cab partition with a knife.” As Ahmed struggled, the cab rolled for two blocks. “The knife came here and when he knife like this by his right hand then I back up like this, then it come here,” Sharif said, showing defensive arm wounds.

Police claimed an under-the-influence Enright lacerated Sharif with a Leatherman military knife. Eventually, the drunk was arrested and charged with “attempted murder as a hate crime.”

In a climate described as “anti-Muslim,” and based on objections to a mosque being erected near Ground Zero, why is a singular act of asinine behavior on the part of a frat-boy with a history of alcohol abuse being called an “explosion” of anti-Muslim sentiment? 

Why couldn’t Enright’s hateful actions be attributed to post-Afghanistan traumatic stress disorder, which many suggested instigated Major Nidal Hasan’s massacre of 13 American soldiers?

As the taxi fracas ensued, instead of exiting the cab, a bloodied Sharif decided to lock the inebriated Enright inside the vehicle.  The injured cabbie chose to shuttle a person dead set on murdering Muslims around town until finding a police officer?  What happened, did Enright black out in the back of the cab?

Javaid Tariq of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance is convinced the incident is a hate crime. “It is not any robbery or fare dispute or anything else. Talking to him, asking him if he’s a Muslim? Telling him, it’s a checkpoint and stabbing him. Of course it’s a hate crime,” and a conveniently timed hate crime at that.

Meanwhile, Ahmed Sharif accepted an invitation from pro-Cordoba Project Mayor Bloomberg to visit City Hall. After Enright’s intolerant act, Sharif could potentially become the official poster child for hate crimes against Muslims in America. 

Ahmed Sharif may have been sliced up by a drunken lout just in time to convince Americans that the only way for the nation’s anti-Muslims sentiment to be breached is by building a 15-story mosque next to Ground Zero.

Next Page »