Ckeck it out! A Guy Witnesses A Car Accident
Heads_Up Diary of the Mad Pigeon
Fri 29 Feb 2008 14:42
Fri 29 Feb 2008 14:17
A group of drunken British soldiers went amok in a bar in northern Norway earlier this week, stripping off their clothes and…

Winter military exercises take place in northern Norway every year, to prepare troops for service in Afghanistan and other areas.
The decidedly un-gentlemanly like behaviour shocked other bar patrons, many of whom had been harassed by the soldiers before they launched into their striptease.
Cecilie Kleppe, age 29, told newspaper VG that the soldiers had been bothering several of the female patrons in the bar before they suddenly shouted "naked bar" and stripped off all their clothes.
"Some of them even started waving their private parts at the other guests," Kleppe told VG. "Two of the Englishmen urinated on a fellow soldier who was lying on the floor. It was disgusting."
At one point, around seven naked soldiers were sitting around the bar in Harstad, which is the main city near the area where British troops take part in winter military exercises. Thousands of soldiers from several countries are in northern Norway for the annual exercises.
The British participation won’t be quickly forgotten. Even though the presence of so many soldiers provides a boost to the local economy, it also has its disadvantages. Some residents say the rowdiness that can come along makes them feel insecure.
The manager of the Sfinx Bar, where the British soldiers went amok late Wednesday night, said he’s never seen anything like it. "I hope it never happens again," he said. No police reports were filed, but military officials claimed such "bad behaviour" would be punished.
The British soldiers’ behaviour at the bar "made everybody react," said Petter Holmbakken, who was in the bar when the stripping and urinating took place. "I can understand that the women were offended. It’s no fun to be plagued by lots of nasty comments.
"To be perfectly honest, I and a lot of other Harstad residents are fed up with the Englishmen."
Heads_Up Fark
Fri 29 Feb 2008 14:04
Channel 4 news presenter Jon Snow was at the centre of a huge row today after praising the American website that revealed Prince Harry’s deployment in Afghanistan.
The British media and the Ministry of Defence had agreed to a voluntary news blackout for fear of increasing the risk to Harry’s life and to the other soldiers serving with him.
But Drudge, which first became famous after revealing Bill Clinton’s affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, ignored the deal and ran the story yesterday afternoon.
Snow, writing in his blog, then thanked the Report for breaking the "British media’s conspiracy of silence" about Harry serving in the front line in Helmand Province.
And he repeated the comments again on Channel 4 last night, sparking fury among viewers - several of whom pledged not to watch its news programme again.
He may be relaxed here but Jon Snow is unlikely to be sitting so easily today after provoking fury by praising the Drudge Report for revealing Harry’s deployment in Helmand
The almost unprecedented media blackout had largely held bar an unnoticed report in Australian women’s magazine, New Idea, in January.
But it collapsed when Drudge went ahead and published its story yesterday afternoon, forcing the Ministry of Defence to issue an official confirmation.
Snow then praised the Report, a largely right-wing political gossip website, in the regular e-mail he sends out to subcribers and publishes online.
He declared: "I never thought I’d find myself saying thank God for Drudge.
"Editors have been sworn to secrecy over Prince Harry being sent to fight in Afghanistan …
"Drudge has blown their cover. One wonders whether viewers, readers and listeners will ever want to trust the media again?"
In a debate on the evening news, Snow asked: "Can you think of another country where this could ever happen other than in a totalitarian state?"
A British paper that did break the story and had not been party to the news black-out could have had "a real scoop", he said.
His stance set him against top brass in the army and in politics, who expressed their disappointment that the embargo had not been respected.
And viewers reacted with a storm of protest, branding him "shameful", "idiotic" and "disgraceful". Channel 4 later revealed that it had 91 phone complaints and watchdog Ofcom a further four.
Matt Drudge broke a deal keeping Harry’s deployment to Helmand a secret
Sue Smith wrote in an e-mail: "Tonight’s show talking about a ‘conspiracy of silence’ and the email from Jon … is so far beyond the pale I will never watch Channel 4 News again.
"By these standards you would have been notifying Hitler of all our secrets. Shameful. Utterly utterly shameful."
Another said: "Jon Snow, in one absolutely idiotic, thoughtless stupid statement, has just lost Channel 4 News one viewer."
Meanwhile, Caroline McNicholas declared: "Jon Snow’s petulant reporting of Prince Harry’s deployment to Afghanistan was television at its worst."
Alan Thomas described Snow’s comments as "absolutely disgraceful" and praised the British media for keeping quiet.
Relatives of soldiers currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan were also unequivocal in their condemnation of the veteran presenter.
Sharon Murphy said: "You have put lives at risk in Afghanistan, one of which is my husband. I hope you can live with the repercussions.
Karen Bojanowski added: "Are you insane? "Thank God for the Drudge Report"???? I am the mother of an American soldier deployed in Iraq.
"Were he famous or a high profile target like the prince, I would consider it an act of treason, lunacy, or fatal stupidity to publish his whereabouts.
"And what of the other fine men, serving with the prince? Are their lives so unimportant to you media scum that you would see them overrun and murdered so that you could print a few pictures of the prince?"
Others simply said that if Jon Snow had not agreed with the media blackout, he should have urged Channel 4 to run the story earlier instead of lambasting the British media after the event.
William Scott wrote: "Shame on you! Here you are, part of a TV station that connived at keeping this story quiet, and yet when it breaks you’ve not got the courage or integrity to face your own organisation with the questions you’re only too happy to ask, very condescendingly, of other people.
"Such nauseating hypocrisy. Almost enough to drive me back to the BBC - but not quite. Just do better next time please."
Mail Online readers also expressed their outrage, branding Snow an "idiot", "twit" and a "studio coward". Several called for him to resign.
Jeanette Franklin, from Dudley, wrote: "I take my hat off to the British media! Jon Snow should be made to eat his!"
Ian Turner, from Aberdeen, added: "Self opinionated, pumped up idiot, he should be sacked immediately!"
And Sandi, from Edinburgh, said: "Jon Snow is a left wing, tantrum throwing embarrassment to journalism."
Evan Jones, from Cardiff, wrote: "John Snow is a fool. I’ve always felt he was arrogant, highly opinionated and truculent. Snow should be booted out, he’s a disgrace.
There was no word from the presenter today on his blog, although an article on the site did discuss his controversial comments.
It said: "This story - potent mix of royalty, politics and the media - will go on.
"One newsroom voice even suggests that UK editors have collectively "nailed their colours to the mast", tacitly supporting the war by agreeing to the blackout."
A Channel 4 News spokeswoman said that, as part of ITN, it had backed the deal with the MoD but that it also stood by Snow despite his criticism of the embargo.
A spokeswoman said: "Of course we stand by Jon Snow as our presenter. ITN did agree with the media blackout. They did not agree that it was wrong.
"Jon Snow was not aware of the blackout in advance of the story breaking."
The broadcaster added: "The studio guests all broadly held the view that the media blackout was the right thing to do and so it was vital that Jon expressed clearly that there was an alternative view."
Controversial MP George Galloway, who was expelled from the Labour Party over comments he made while opposing the war in Iraq, was yesterday one of the few other voices to criticise the bargain struck with the MoD.
The Bethnal Green and Bow MP, speaking on BBC1’s Question Time, said that he did not like the British media, particularly the BBC, becoming "part of the war effort".
He added: "Prince Harry was saying on TV that he was engaging the enemy. I don’t know about you, but I have no enemies in Afghanistan."
When challenged by host David Dimbleby over whether the Taliban were the enemy, he replied: "The Taliban are not the enemy for me."
The Drudge Report has so far shown no signs of regret for its "world exclusive" but it too has received a flood of e-mails from readers criticising its decision to go public.
Practically every comment made on the story on its website today was critical, dubbing it "totally irresponsible", "disrespectful" and "disgusting".
Dianne1 wrote: "As somebody who has relatives and friends in Afghanistan, I’m disgusted that you and other media sources would release information that will affect the security of the troops there.
"Obviously there is a reason the British press did not report about Prince Harry. Al-Qaeda is interested in such a high-profile target, and consequently those who serve with Prince Harry are put in harm’s way."
Reader, John Boyle, did not mince his words, writing: "By breaking this news you have placed his and the lives of his colleagues in unnecessary danger.
"I hope the fleas of a thousand camels infest your a***holes."
And another wrote: "What a great shame you people just couldn’t leave alone. You could learn something important from this - but I doubt you will. Such stupidity. Yours, disgusted in the UK."
Yet more anger was directed at the Australian magazine New Idea, which originally broke the story back in January.
Its website was flooded with readers who called for a boycott on the magazine and branded its journalists "guttersnipes" and "brain-dead morons".
One e-mail summed up the reaction as: "New Idea? No bloody idea, more like."
Another reader wrote: "Disgraceful, typical of you useless non-thinking ‘chicklit’ journalists to let this news out and compromise Harry’s chance at being able to do his job.
"You should be ashamed of yourselves."
Further comments flooded in on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s news website.
Paul Hannah wrote: "I see no evidence of any care here, unless of course it is for their own circulation."
A spokesman for the magazine said today that it was unaware of the press embargo and would not knowingly have broken it.
He said: "We take these matters very seriously and would never knowingly break an embargo.
"We regret any issues the revelation of this story in America has caused today."
On its website, any reference to Harry’s deployment had been replaced with a biography of the young royal.
Fri 29 Feb 2008 13:20

Dominican native Rafael A. Nunez, left on steps, at Reading High School on Thursday, the day after he gave a motivational speech at an assembly. Seniors Merelyn C. Janse, center, and Denise M. Disla, both Dominicans
Reading, PA - A celebration of the Dominican Republic’s independence day involving as many as 1,500 students outside Reading High School erupted in violence Wednesday afternoon.
A city police captain was injured and at least a half-dozen students were arrested.
An unruly crowd of 1,000 to 1,500 high school students blocked streets around the school and threw rocks and bottles at police when officers tried to disperse them, authorities said.
Deputy Police Chief Mark E. Talbot Sr. said the violent mob was unprecedented and created one of the scariest situations he’s had in his career in Reading.
Some students hit parked cars with baseball bats, and at least one student was reported hurt after someone hit him in the head with a bat, police said.
About 40 police officers — every on-duty officer in the city — responded to the melee, investigators said.
City police Capt. Edward J. Kosmerl Jr. was treated in Reading Hospital after a rock struck him in the head near 13th and Green streets about 4:30, police said.
Kosmerl was standing on the corner with another officer when a crowd of about 100 youths waving Dominican flags passed on the sidewalk, investigators said.
A few seconds later, a golf-ball size rock thrown by someone in the group hit Kosmerl on the side of the head, police said.
Kosmerl, 59, a 34-year veteran of the force, was taken to the hospital by another officer and received several stitches, according to police. He was home Wednesday night but declined comment.
Acting schools Superintendent Anthony A. Georeno said Wednesday night that students of Dominican descent were involved in a variety of celebrations in the school during the day, including an approved assembly with a speaker.
Georeno said he did not know the name of the speaker nor the topic of his presentation.
High school Principal Wynton Butler could not be reached.
Police said they did not know why the students became unruly as they were dismissed from school.
"There was an assembly, and the kids decided to have a big celebration in the streets," said Lt. Albert E. Evans of the patrol division, who was standing beside Kosmerl when he was attacked. "We had police outside the school like we do every day, but it got way out of hand, so we ended up sending every police officer in City Hall up there."
Even with so many officers on hand, police had a difficult time controlling the crowd.
Police were trying only to contain the students and prevent serious violence, Evans said.
Police said school administrators and staff watched as chaos erupted outside the school and did nothing to help police struggling to control the crowd.
Georeno, who did not witness the melee, said his staff told him the gathering was peaceful before police arrived.
Georeno said a group of students he described as jubilant unfurled a Dominican flag as they left the school and held an impromptu parade.
He said school officials did not intervene because the students were orderly and peaceful as they left school property.
The crowd marched through the area for about 90 minutes before breaking up.
Kosmerl was injured near the end of the demonstration, which progressed from the school at 13th and Douglass streets, down Douglass to Eighth Street, over to Green Street and up Spring Street to 10th and 11th streets, police said.
Many students waved red, white and blue Dominican flags and wore red shirts as they paraded.
Students shook their fists and yelled as cars passed.
Police said some of them were running onto porches shouting. Neighbors did not know what was going on, and police said they were caught off guard.
Police handcuffed about six students and took them to City Hall to be charged. Further information about them was unavailable.
Police Chief William M. Heim said he called retired state Trooper Raymond J. Albert, the school district’s safety coordinator, and told him the department would like to know before something like the parade happens again.
"He said they had the same thing last year with no trouble," Heim said. "But certainly we cannot have 1,000 kids parading through the city and blocking the streets. You need to get a permit for something like that so that we can block off the route and keep traffic moving."
Ungrateful gawddamn foreign nationals; toss their Dominican flag waving rioting asses out of the U.S. of A.!
Fri 29 Feb 2008 12:53

Feral pigs gather Ft. Benning fence
FORT BENNING, Ga. - Maj. Bobby Toon is known as the Pig Czar at the huge army post on Georgia’s western edge.
He has been assigned to help rid Fort Benning of its unwanted guests: an estimated 6,000 feral pigs that roam the 184,000-acre installation.
The animals, common throughout Georgia, are known for tearing up woodlands and farms. They are aggressive foragers, gobbling up native vegetation and endangered species.
"These pigs feed and breed," Toon said. "That’s all they care about. I’ve been here off and on for 17 years, and I can never remember a pig population as big as it is now."
Since July, more than 900 pigs have been killed.
"These animals can smell a turkey egg three miles away," Toon said. "They’re also a danger to tortoises and woodpeckers."
The former 2nd Battalion, 69th Armor Regiment company commander, who now instructs a course at the Maneuver Captains Career Course, has personally brought down 68 pigs in the past year.
He’s not the only pig hunter at work.
About 2,000 people who are authorized to hunt on the post have been encouraged to go after the feral pigs. They must be active-duty, retired military or civilian workers at Benning and must have a license from the base.
The post is offering a $40 bounty for every pig tail that’s brought in.
"We did a cost estimate with civilian contractors, but they wanted way too much money for the job," Toon said.

Toon, Fort Benning’s feral pig czar, displays one of his trophies
Fri 29 Feb 2008 10:51
Ah, irony. Funny how that works.
Via CFP:

Anti-US military Marxist Medea Benjamin
Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin, who can turn the air blue when shouting chants against American Marines called out for the Marines in front of Marine Recruiting offices in Berkeley yesterday.
Eamon Kelley, the young Marine who is featured in Move America Forward’s TV commercial that ran on Fox News earlier this week, could hardly believe his own ears when Benjamin called on the Marines for help.
Kelley, who is recovering from back surgery, spent his day in Berkeley, where CodePink continues with Berkeley council’s blessing, to keep a virtual blockade at the recruit center, expanding its efforts to harass American troops and to turn back any young Americans looking to enlist.
City Council stubbornly refuses to apologize and continues to subsidize free parking for CodePink to drive soldiers out of town.
“While we were at the protest in Berkeley from 12 to 4 p.m., a white Volvo drove by and a man spat upon CodePink,” Kelley wrote in an email to MAF’s Melanie Morgan. “They chased him down the street and got into a verbal altercation. The police were NOWHERE in sight.
“That’s not the best part, ready for this?
“Medea Benjamin yelled and I quote “Marines!” She actually yelled for our help because this man had stepped out of his car. I even asked her if she was yelling Police and she told me, “I said Marines” then put her arm around my friend Allen (the Marine Vet). Ironic?”

Fri 29 Feb 2008 10:08
Via BLF:
The Billboard Liberation Front today announced a major new advertising improvement campaign executed on behalf of clients AT&T and the National Security Agency. Focusing on billboards in the San Francisco area, this improvement action is designed to promote and celebrate the innovative collaboration of these two global communications giants.
"This campaign is an extraordinary rendition of a public-private partnership," observed BLF spokesperson Blank DeCoverly. "These two titans of telecom have a long and intimate relationship, dating back to the age of the telegraph. In these dark days of Terrorism, that should be a comfort to every law-abiding citizen with nothing to hide."
Thu 28 Feb 2008 13:49

Kathy Strong has worn a bracelet engraved with the name of a young soldier missing in Vietnam — a man she never knew — for more than 35 years.
WALNUT CREEK — She’s never met him, and it’s likely that he’s dead. Yet Kathy Strong feels a powerful bond with James Leslie Moreland.
He was a Green Beret in the Vietnam War who has been Missing in Action since Feb. 7, 1968. Strong has worn a bracelet engraved with Moreland’s name for more than 35 years, fulfilling a promise she made when she received it to keep the simple stainless steel band on her wrist until he returned home.
"I was in seventh grade when I put the bracelet on," said Strong, a 47-year-old Walnut Creek resident who works in Richmond. "He was missing almost five years by the time I got the bracelet."
She received the trinket Christmas Day 1972 in her stocking. It was one of about 5 million bracelets made to remind Americans of the more than 2,500 military personnel who were missing or prisoners during the Vietnam War.
Moreland, who lived in Anaheim, is one of 1,788 troops still missing from that war. Of those, 179 are from California.
Dating back to World War II, there are about 88,000 troops unaccounted for, said Capt. Mary Olsen, spokeswoman for the Defense Department’s Prisoner of War-Missing in Action, or POW-MIA, office. Currently, four soldiers are missing in Iraq.
"I was very young when Vietnam was going on," said Strong, who lived in Southern California when she received the bracelet. "I don’t really understand a lot of the politics behind it. But personally, I don’t believe we should go to any other war until we get our men back from the last war."
As Strong grew into adulthood, she gradually learned more about the man who has been a presence in her life for decades.
Through research in books about Vietnam, Strong found that Moreland was seriously injured and presumed dead at age 22 in the battle at Lang Vei. When she marked the 40th anniversary earlier this month of the last time he was seen alive, Strong decided to make her story public to remind people in Contra Costa County and the country that there are still hundreds of American military personnel missing and that she and others are keeping their memories alive.
"I’ve never been to Vietnam," Strong said. "But I still feel a connection with my MIA as well as the others who were with him the night he died."
Paul Longgrear, Moreland’s commanding officer, survived the battle and now lives near Atlanta. Longgrear shed light on Moreland’s probable death in a phone interview with the Times.
After being attacked, Longgrear, Moreland and a handful of other men retreated into an underground bunker, said Longgrear, 64. Moreland was a medic in the small mobile strike force.
Moreland climbed up to retrieve a machine gun, said Longgrear, who was 25 at the time.
"While he was there," Longgrear said, "a tank shot at him and shattered the back of his head with shrapnel. It was a very devastating wound, but he was a tough kid."
Moreland lived through the night and was injured again when the enemy began blowing up the camp, Longgrear said. The officer and his men decided to make a break for it.
"When we got ready to go," he said, "Moreland was unresponsive. The best we could determine, he was dead or wasn’t going to live. Everybody was wounded, and we were kind of limited in what we could do for each other."
Longgrear and some others were picked up by a special forces helicopter. A few men were captured.
"Moreland’s body was never found," Longgrear said. "He was a great kid. We used to have a lot of fun. He was a good-looking kid, about 6-foot-1, 185 pounds. He had a real cocky attitude. We all did. We were Green Berets — thought we were 10 feet tall and bulletproof."
Longgrear said that he and other veterans are glad that people such as Strong have worn their POW-MIA bracelets for all these years, in honor of their fallen friends.
"It makes me very appreciative of someone who loves America and appreciates a person who would go and sacrifice their life," Longgrear said. "I think it’s wonderful that this young lady cares enough not to give up hope. And that’s what I think the bracelet symbolizes — that we will not forget you."
Strong said she would like to meet Moreland’s family, but Longgrear said he doubted the family would be receptive. Moreland’s sister contacted Longgrear twice to talk about her brother.
"I know his parents are dead," Longgrear said. "It’s very difficult. It’s such an emotional thing. The whole family became a victim because when you’re missing (someone) like that, there’s no closure."
The League of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia has continued to pressure the government to bring the remains of their loved ones home. The original group that sold the POW-MIA bracelets disbanded in 1976.
But the Ohio chapter of the league has revived the effort, selling bracelets with the names of about 100 missing troops who served in Vietnam. Their families have given permission for the sale. In addition, bracelets for Navy Capt. Scott Speicher, missing from the 1991 Gulf War, and Army Sgt. Keith Maupin, a prisoner of war in Iraq, also are available.
Liz Flick, who distributes the bracelets for the chapter, said she and others she knows have been wearing their bracelets as long as Strong.
"It is very definitely a brotherhood of those of us who wear the bracelets," she said. "If you’re out and you see someone with the bracelet and you hold up your wrist, it’s an immediate connection — like yes, you’re working on this, too."
Strong said she’s happy to know that there is a network of people like her in the country. And if Moreland’s remains are not recovered in her lifetime, she is determined to die with the bracelet still wrapped around her wrist.
"It’s just a promise I made to this person, and it’s a promise I intend on keeping." Strong said. "I could take the bracelet off, and probably no one would notice. But I would know."
More information about military Prisoners of War and those Missing in Action is at http://www.pow-miafamilies.org or http://www.powmialeague.org and http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo.
Details about Special Forces killed in Southeast Asia are at http://www.sfahq.com.
POW/MIA bracelets can be purchased by sending a check or money order for $10 to Ohio Chapter MIA/POW, Attn: Mrs. Liz Flick, P.O. Box 14853, Columbus, OH 43214.
Thu 28 Feb 2008 11:29

Barack Obama displayed his bizarre views on foreign and domestic policy during Tuesday night’s Democrat presidential debate but nobody in the media seemed to notice. This is a candidate who is pitifully ignorant on some of the major issues facing our nation.
This is a strange presidential campaign, and the coverage is even stranger. Under media pressure, John McCain has apologized because radio talk-show host Bill Cunningham opened a McCain rally by noting that Barack Obama’s full name is Barack Hussein Obama. The media were upset not only because he went after Obama, but because Cunningham’s hilarious remarks on liberal media bias were so on target.
But speaking of names, will anyone in the major media talk about the mysterious “Frank.” He’s Obama’s childhood mentor in his book, Dreams From My Father.We discovered he’s Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party member and anti-American revolutionary. Isn’t this as newsworthy as the African garb Obama wore on a foreign trip? Isn’t what’s in Obama’s head as important as the clothes he wears?
The American people have been terribly served by the media during this campaign, and the latest bad performance was turned in by those commenting on Tuesday night’s debate on MSNBC. They failed to note that Obama made two serious gaffes. First, Obama showed ignorance of what led to the crisis in Kosovo, where a U.S.-Russian confrontation is now playing out, and he seemed to advocate some kind of U.S. military response through NATO. If a President Obama carried through on such a threat, it would be a foreign policy mistake of monumental proportions. It could lead to a war with Russia in the current circumstances.
Second, Obama didn’t seem to understand that in the case of the disabled woman, Terri Schiavo, the issue was giving her the same kind of due process rights that are guaranteed to death row killers. We now know where Obama really stands, and it is not a pretty picture.
NBC’s Tim Russert has done a fairly good job during the debates and he had some good questions of the candidates on Tuesday night. One was when he asked Obama what he would do if Russia helped Serbia militarily take control of Kosovo, which is under United Nations and NATO occupation and recently declared its independence.
Obama had a long answer: “Well, I think that we work with the international community that has also recognized Kosovo, and state that that’s unacceptable. But, fortunately, we have a strong international structure anchored in NATO to deal with this issue. We don’t have to work in isolation. And this is an area where I think that the Clinton administration deserves a lot of credit, is, you know, the way in which they put together a coalition that has functioned. It has not been perfect, but it saved lives. And we created a situation in which not only Kosovo, but other parts of the former Yugoslavia at least have the potential to over time build democracies and enter into the broader European community. But, you know, be very clear: We have recognized the country of Kosovo as an independent, sovereign nation, as has Great Britain and many other countries in the region. And I think that that carries with it, then, certain obligations to ensure that they are not invaded.”
What does he mean by that? How does he propose that the U.S. and NATO stop an invasion of Kosovo by Serbia? The fact is that, despite its declaration of independence, Kosovo is still recognized by many nations as a province of Serbia. The “nation” of Kosovo is not recognized as such by the UN, and Russia and China have vowed to oppose its membership in the world body. What’s more, as former U.S. Ambassador to the UN John Bolton points out, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 reaffirmed Serbian sovereignty in Kosovo. This was agreed to by the U.S. So a pledge by the U.S. to protect Kosovo from an “invasion” would be viewed as further meddling in a civil war.
His comments about the Clinton Administration and Kosovo are apparently a reference to Clinton’s NATO war against Serbia over who was going to control the province. The war was illegal and unconstitutional. Clinton launched it without Congressional approval and continued it when Congress failed to authorize it after the fact. Yet Obama was defending Clinton’s actions there. His statements about this foreign policy problem were reckless and ignorant.
The problem for the Republicans is that Senator John McCain voted for the war against Serbia and has now, like Hillary and Obama, expressed support for Kosovo’s declaration of independence.
On the Schiavo case, Obama said the following: “Well, you know, when I first arrived in the Senate that first year, we had a situation surrounding Terri Schiavo. And I remember how we adjourned with a unanimous agreement that eventually allowed Congress to interject itself into that decision-making process of the families. It wasn’t something I was comfortable with, but it was not something that I stood on the floor and stopped. And I think that was a mistake, and I think the American people understood that that was a mistake. And as a constitutional law professor, I knew better. And so that’s an example I think of where inaction…”
Russert explained, “This is the young woman with the feeding tube… and the family disagreed as to whether it should be removed or not.”
Obama replied, “And I think that’s an example of inaction, and sometimes that can be as costly as action.”
Once again, Obama demonstrated his ignorance of the true facts. Congress decided to “interject itself” into the situation because the family was divided over caring for the brain-damaged woman and there had been no federal review of the facts in the case. All that Congress did was authorize a federal judge to examine the situation. This is guaranteed to all federal inmates on death row so they are not executed without complete respect for their due process rights. Isn’t a disabled woman entitled to similar rights? Many forget that Schiavo’s parents and siblings only wanted the right to keep her alive and take care of her. It was her estranged husband who wanted her dead. What harm would have been caused by letting her live?
Obama’s statement that he wanted Congress to stay out of this matter and that he personally should have “stopped” congressional action reflects a callous disregard for the rights of disabled people. And yet he claimed to be speaking during the debate as someone with the experience of “a constitutional law professor.” In fact, Congress should have done more; Schiavo was eventually starved to death by her estranged husband after a federal judge refused to save her life. If the constitution doesn’t protect the rights of the most innocent and defenseless among us, what good is it? What constitution did Obama study in law school? Where did he get his ideas about human worth and dignity?
During a previous debate, on this very subject, McCain sounded like Obama, saying that “In retrospect, we should have taken some more time, looked at it more carefully, and probably we acted too hastily.” In effect, McCain was repudiating the effort to save Terri’s life. So once again we have a major issue facing the country and yet there is really no difference between Obama and McCain.
It looks, therefore, like it’s going to be a very boring campaign. We all need that pillow Hillary says the media are giving Obama. We need to see more, not less, of people like Bill Cunningham, even though McCain has now fed him to the sharks. At least Cunningham had the guts to utter Obama’s full name.
Thu 28 Feb 2008 11:24
By Scott Ott for ScrappleFace
President George Bush today signed an executive order granting ‘amnesty’ to foreign-born Sen. John McCain, allowing the presumptive Republican nominee to bypass the Constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.”
John Sidney McCain III was born in the Panama Canal zone when his Naval officer father was stationed there in 1936. The Supreme Court has never definitively interpreted the phrase “natural born”, but no person known to be born outside U.S. borders has ever been elected president.
Under President Bush’s order, Sen. McCain would be granted and immediate ‘P visa’ allowing him to remain in the U.S., with ‘guest candidate’ status, as he works toward full presidential eligibility.
“My compassion moves me to create a legal path to the presidency for my amigo, John McCain,” said Mr. Bush. “Of course, he’ll need to pay a $2,000 fine, but he already speaks English better than some recent presidents.”
Thu 28 Feb 2008 11:02
Via WaPo:
Visitors to some national parks would be able to start packing heat along with their tents and picnic baskets under a proposal being considered by the Interior Department that would ease restrictions on loaded firearms in the parks.
Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said last week that officials would review long-standing regulations that require firearms in most national parks to be unloaded and inoperable — through the use of trigger locks, for example, or storage in a car trunk or a special case. The department intends to propose new rules by April 30.
The review pits the National Rifle Association and a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers against park rangers and advocates who decry the move as election-year posturing that could make the parks more dangerous.
Kempthorne’s action comes in response to two recent letters from 51 senators — 44 Republicans and seven Democrats — requesting that the National Park Service align its gun rules with state laws. If a state permits citizens to carry concealed weapons, the national parks in that state should, too, they argued.
"These inconsistencies in firearms regulations for public lands are confusing, burdensome and unnecessary," wrote the lawmakers, led by Sens. Michael D. Crapo (R-Idaho) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.). ". . . Such regulatory changes would respect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners, while providing a consistent application of state weapons laws across all land ownership boundaries."
The most recent revision of the rules came in 1983, but parks advocates say the restrictions date at least to the 1930s and mainly were designed to prevent poaching. The NRA praised Kempthorne’s move, noting that 48 states now have processes that allow people to legally carry firearms for self-defense, compared with six states in 1982.
The group also wants national parks to be on an even footing with lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service, where the rules on firearm possession match state laws. NRA officials cast the matter as a safety issue as well as a Second Amendment issue.
"Law-abiding citizens should not be prohibited from protecting themselves and their families while enjoying America’s national parks and wildlife refuges," Chris W. Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist, said in a statement.
Parks advocates and rangers’ organizations say allowing loaded weapons would increase illegal hunting, add a deadly element to many domestic disputes and generally make the parks less secure and family-friendly.
"There is no need to walk around a national park with a loaded weapon," said Bryan Faehner, a former park ranger now with the National Parks Conservation Association, an advocacy group. "It’s a political maneuver by the NRA. They are using this as a political tool to build up support heading into the elections."
He added that "it’s impossible for park rangers to know the difference between someone walking on a trail with a gun, and someone walking on a trail with a gun who is a poacher. This is a management nightmare for the Park Service."
Bill Wade, a former superintendent at Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, said replacing a single standard with rules that vary by state would create more confusion, not less. "It might simplify things for people who are in one particular state, but it sure makes it more complicated for people who are visiting parks from different places in the country," said Wade, a leader of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who joined other lawmakers in writing Kempthorne, has sponsored an amendment to a public lands bill that would accomplish the changes legislatively. But the bill is bogged down in the Senate, in part because of a dispute with Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) over the provision.
Interior Department spokesman Chris Paolino said the public will be able to comment on whatever changes the department proposes.
———
Related: Mexican drug cartels taking over U.S. National Parks
Excerpt:
Armed combat is hardly what families hope to encounter as they head for their summer vacations in America’s national parks and forests. But drug smugglers, methamphetamine cooks and cannabis cultivators are invading federal lands as never before. A U.S. Park Service ranger in Arizona’s Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument was gunned down by a Mexican pot smuggler last August. In Missouri’s Mark Twain National Forest, 192 meth labs have been dismantled over the past three years. And marijuana farms are infesting Kentucky’s Daniel Boone National Forest and Alabama’s Talladega National Forest. [Full Article]

Thu 28 Feb 2008 10:52
TYLER, Texas: Republican presidential hopeful John McCain mocked Barack Obama’s view of al-Qaeda in Iraq, and the Democratic contender responded that GOP policies brought the terrorist group there. The exchange Wednesday underscored that the two consider each other likely general election rivals, even though the Democratic contest remains unresolved. McCain criticized Obama for saying in Tuesday night’s Democratic debate that, after U.S. troops were withdrawn, as president he would act "if al-Qaeda is forming a base in Iraq." "I have some news. Al-Qaeda is in Iraq. It’s called ‘al-Qaeda in Iraq,’ " McCain told a crowd in Tyler, Texas, drawing laughter at Obama’s expense. He said Obama’s statement was "pretty remarkable." Obama quickly answered back. "I do know that al-Qaeda is in Iraq, and that’s why I have said we should continue to strike al-Qaeda targets," he told a rally at Ohio State University in Columbus. "But I have some news for John McCain," Obama added. "There was no such thing as al-Qaeda in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq. … They took their eye off the people who were responsible for 9/11 and that would be al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, that is stronger now than at any time since 2001." Noting that McCain likes to tell audiences that he’d follow Osama bin Laden to the "gates of hell" to catch him, Obama taunted, "All he (McCain) has done is to follow George Bush into a misguided war in Iraq." McCain said he had not watched Tuesday night’s debate but was told of Obama’s response when asked whether as president he would reserve the right to send U.S. troops back into Iraq to quell an insurrection or civil war. Obama didn’t say whether he’d send troops but said: "As commander in chief, I will always reserve the right to make sure that we are looking out for American interests. And if al-Qaeda is forming a base in Iraq, then wewill have to act in a way that secures the American homeland and our interests abroad." On Wednesday, Obama expanded slightly that he "would always reserve the right to go in and strike al-Qaeda if they were in Iraq" without detailing what kind of strike that might be. McCain said later in San Antonio, "So I guess that means that he would surrender and then go back." Throughout the primary season, McCain has attacked Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton for saying they would withdraw troops from Iraq. " If we left, they (al-Qaeda) wouldn’t be establishing a base," McCain said Wednesday. "They’d be taking a country, and I’m not going to allow that to happen."
Thu 28 Feb 2008 10:38
Five states did something over the past 12 months that no state had done before: expressed regret or apologized for slavery. This year, Congress, which meets in a Capitol built partly by slaves, will consider issuing its own apology. "We’ve seen states step forward on this," says Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, citing the resolutions of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Alabama and New Jersey. "I’m really shocked, just shocked" that the federal government hasn’t apologized. "It’s time to do so." Harkin says he and Sen. Sam Brownback R-Kan., will propose as early as March an apology not only for slavery but for subsequent "Jim Crow" laws that furthered racial segregation. So far, they have 14 Senate backers, including Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama. A similar House measure introduced last year has 120 co-sponsors. "I think 2008 will be the year," says Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn. He says an apology could begin a dialogue about race that Obama could continue as the nation’s first black president. "The success of the Obama candidacy underscores the irrelevance of an apology" because it shows "enormous progress" in race relations, says Roger Clegg of the Center for Equal Opportunity, a conservative group that describes itself as opposed to racial preferences. "Haven’t we already moved beyond it?" Congress has apologized before, but not for slavery. It apologized to Japanese-Americans in 1988 for holding them in camps during World War II and gave each survivor $20,000. In 1993, Congress apologized to native Hawaiians for the overthrow of their kingdom a century earlier. In 2005, the Senate apologized for not enacting anti-lynching legislation. The Senate has no record of any prior effort to apologize for slavery. In the House of Representatives, Tony Hall, an Ohio Democrat, proposed one in 1997, and Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., has tried since 1989 to pass a bill that would create a commission to study slavery’s impact and possible remedies, including reparations, which can be cash payments. Apologies are controversial because of concern they could lead to reparations. They "carry weight" as a step toward racial healing and don’t have to "open the door" to reparations, says Carol Swain, professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University. Other proponents say an apology should lead to remedies. "A mere apology doesn’t do anything for me," says state Rep. Talibdin El-Amin, a Democrat who is lobbying for such a resolution in Missouri. An apology is a necessary first step because it recognizes a wrongdoing, says Hilary Shelton of the NAACP. He says it’s "hollow," though, unless it leads to a remedy for African-Americans, who still suffer economically and educationally from the aftereffects of slavery and segregation. Remedies don’t have to be monetary payments but could be government programs to help the disadvantaged, Cohen says. An apology is counterproductive, Clegg says. "It taps into white guilt and helps perpetuate social programs the civil rights establishment likes, such as racial preferences and ultimately reparations," he says. Clegg says that an apology serves "no legitimate purpose since the villains and victims are long since deceased" and that such an action could instead be divisive and "keep racial wounds alive." The state apologies have not given a boost to the reparations movement, says Ronald Walters, author of a book titled The Price of Racial Reconciliation. Last February, Virginia became the first state to issue a form of apology, expressing "profound regret," as did Maryland lawmakers a month later. The three states that followed expressed regret and apologized. Alabama and New Jersey added language saying the apology cannot be used to sue the state. The House proposal does not include such a disclaimer, but the Senate one does, saying its apology cannot be the basis for claims against the United States. Harkin says his proposal does not address reparations. "We’re just apologizing," he says. "You can’t undo the past, but you can recognize a wrong was done."
Thu 28 Feb 2008 10:34
Dubai: US-based Boston University will offer a range of graduate and postgraduate programmes in dentistry and allied health sciences in Dubai by 2011, making it the first time in the academic institution’s history to open beyond its geographical borders.
Mohammad Al Gergawi, Executive Chairman of Dubai Holding, inaugurated the construction of the new Boston University building as part of the Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Academic Medical Centre at Dubai Healthcare City (DHCC), a member of Tatweer.
The ceremony was conducted in the presence of Joseph Mercurio, Executive Vice-President of Boston University, and Jeffrey Hutter, Interim Dean of Goldman School of Dental Medicine Boston University.
"As a world-renowned academic institution, Boston University’s move to the emirate signals a crucial step forward for the healthcare and educational sectors in the region. It also complements the objectives of Dubai Strategic Plan 2015 as outlined by His Highness Shaikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai," said Al Gergawi.
Joseph Mercurio, Executive Vice-President of Boston University, said: "Boston University is proud to move into the region. We are committed to raising healthcare standards that complement our status as one of the world’s oldest leading private research and teaching institutions."
Thu 28 Feb 2008 10:22
The Air Force, which needs all the help it can get on the public relations front, has banned access to blogs:
The Air Force is tightening restrictions on which blogs its troops can read, cutting off access to just about any independent site with the word "blog" in its web address. It’s the latest move in a larger struggle within the military over the value — and hazards — of the sites. At least one senior Air Force official calls the squeeze so "utterly stupid, it makes me want to scream."
Until recently, each major command of the Air Force had some control over what sites their troops could visit, the Air Force Times reports. Then the Air Force Network Operations Center, under the service’s new "Cyber Command," took over.
Cyber Command, which is a bureaucratic construct of questionable necessity built around the need for effective network defense, has now expanded its mission from network defense to regulating internet usage within the Air Force’s Major Commands. It seems reasonable, then, to ask whether time spent policing the internet habits of those in the service will, by diverting scarce resources, undermine the command’s ability to defend against legitimate cyberattacks, and to return fire.
Also problematic is the fact that USAF bloggers have been among the most credible advocates for force-modernization plans, offering their strong support for the acquisition of the full fleet of 380 F-22s in particular. The Air Force has in one fell swoop discarded a valuable media asset, forcing the public to rely on cumbersome–and typically boring–USAF press releases instead.
Because Air Force public relations isn’t so much an effective media campaign as it is a crawl from one PR disaster to another, the service needs bloggers now more than ever. Which makes this a strange and almost certainly counterproductive move.
——-
AF seeks $18B more, but Congress wary
By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition
WASHINGTON — Air Force officials believe they need $18 billion beyond their base budget next year to pay for critical programs, but members of Congress are concerned about the already hefty military price tag planned for coming years. The fiscal 2009 budget proposal for the Air Force already tops $117 billion, a 7.9 percent increase from fiscal 2008. Earlier this month, Pentagon planners unveiled a $515 billion Defense budget for fiscal 2009, the highest since the end of World War II when adjusted for inflation. That doesn’t include funds for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, which will be handled in later supplemental budget requests. And those funds don’t include nearly $30 billion in unfunded priorities detailed by each of the services to Congress last week. Most of the Army and Marine Corps requests, totaling almost $7 billion, focus on reset and replacement of equipment used in combat operations overseas. But the Air Force’s list includes more than 160 new aircraft, acceleration research and development schedules on several planes, and billions in upgrades to existing equipment — all projects service officials say are long overdue for their aging fleet. “The dilemma we have been in with the ‘holiday’ on aircraft procurement is affecting us in many ways,” Gen. Michael Moseley, Air Force Chief of Staff, told members of the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday. “By flying these older planes longer, the cost per flying hour goes up, the break rates go up, you need more maintenance and crew fees.” Members of the committee promised to find ways to get some of the extra money to the service, to ensure the country’s air superiority. But across Capitol Hill, members of the House Budget Committee debated whether increasing military spending has eliminated any hope of balancing the national budget in the next decade. Chairman John Spratt Jr., D-S.C., said even with a hypothetical reduction in U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan to around 75,000 by 2013, operations in those two countries will likely cost the U.S. more than $1 trillion in the next decade. He criticized the Defense Department’s decision not to include the cost of combat operations in the base budget, saying it limits lawmakers’ ability to balance all military needs with fiscal responsibility. “We need better numbers,” he said. “We need a good, firm basis to work from is we are indeed genuine about getting this budget on a sustainable course.” Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England responded that Defense officials have not had a stable budget over the years from which to work, creating a series of cutbacks and buildups over the last 40 years. He advocated setting aside a specific percentage of the country’s gross domestic product for military spending; Republicans in the House in recent years have pushed for a 4 percent promise from Congress for defense funding. “We know that $515 billion is a lot of money,” England told the committee. “But that’s what it takes to defend this country.”
Thu 28 Feb 2008 10:01
PARMA, Ohio — A kindergarten student with a freshly spiked Mohawk has been suspended from school.
Michelle Barile, the mother of 6-year-old Bryan Ruda, said nothing in the Parma Community School handbook prohibits the haircut, characterized by closely shaved sides with a strip of prominent hair on top. The school said the hair was a distraction for other students.
"I understand they have a dress code. I understand he has a uniform. But this is total discrimination," she said. "They can’t tell me how I can cut his hair."
Thu 28 Feb 2008 09:40
Honeywell Aerospace said Wednesday that it is eliminating 420 manufacturing jobs at its north Phoenix facility and plans to move the jobs to Indonesia and Malaysia starting in the third quarter.
The process could take 18 to 24 months to complete, spokesman Bill Reavis said.
Honeywell Aerospace, a unit of global manufacturer Honeywell International Inc., is one of the Valley’s biggest employers.
About 12,600 people are on the payroll in various divisions throughout Arizona, Reavis said.
Honeywell Aerospace currently employs about 2,500 workers at the north Phoenix site.
"It’s a decision to remain globally competitive in the markets that we serve," Reavis said.
"The company has to continue evaluating its operations and business practices in all locations in order to best serve (its) customers."
The company will provide severance packages and outplacement help to affected workers who are eligible, he said.
They will also be able to apply for open positions in the company.
"It was a very tough decision for the company to make," he said. "We understand that it’s going to impact a number of our employees. We’re working with them to make sure that transition is going to be as smooth as possible."
Reavis would not say how much money the cuts would save the company or what the average salary range was for the affected workers.
The announcement comes a month after Honeywell Process Solutions, which makes factory-automation systems, said it planned to eliminate 240 jobs from its Phoenix facility.
Those cuts target 180 manufacturing positions and 60 engineering positions.
Thu 28 Feb 2008 09:35

Mohammed Hamid has been found guilty of organising terrorist training camps. He called himself Osama bin London. The new plans aim to stop terrorism spreading
Every part of Britain will be mapped for its potential to produce violent Muslim extremists under a new strategy drawn up by senior police officers, it has emerged.
At its counter-terrorism conference in Brighton this week, the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) approved a blueprint for how to prevent al Qaeda recruiting fresh supporters.
The 40-page document aims to stop extremist ideas gaining hold in schools, colleges, prisons and over the internet.
It includes advice for parents on how to stop their children searching for jihadist websites.
"The internet is a potential area where a tendency towards violent extremism can be exploited…" it reads.
"Parents and carers have a need for advice on how to control access for their children and to understand what defines the legal-potentially illegal divide."
The strategy also outlines details of an anti-extremist agenda to be included at every level of state-maintained education from primary school to university by 2008-09.
It speaks of a "pressing need" to develop relationships between the police and the education sector "at every level" with regard to preventing violent extremism.
It also warns: "Research last year revealed that the police service would be very low on the list of agencies that the Muslim community would turn to if they had concerns about a member of their community who embraced violent extremism…
"The police service has a long way to go in building a relationship of trust around these issues."
The strategy will be rooted in "neighbourhood profiling" to establish what is normal and what is unusual behaviour.
An unnamed senior source told The Guardian that it was important to map areas of the country for their tendency to produce extremists.
The source said: "You have to assess where the need is greatest. Just relying on the census data for the number of Muslims in an area is not detailed or sophisticated enough."
The document has not yet been published, but it was presented to the conference on Tuesday by Sir Norman Bettison, Acpo’s lead on preventing extremism.

Notorious: Finsbury Park Mosque has been linked to Muslim terrorists
Thu 28 Feb 2008 09:28

BALAD, Iraq - Flying in slow circles four miles above Baghdad in the back of a four-engine C-130, the Air Force Academy’s Capt. Linda Thorstenson waits for a call.
It could be from a convoy under attack, or just someone checking a radio. She’s their security blanket, ensuring that when they pick up their radios, someone will hear them on the other end.
“We’re 911 operators at 20,000 feet,” said Thorstenson, who teaches cadets the basics of flying in Colorado Springs and helps coach the academy’s gymnastics team.
“We’re there if they need us.”
Thorstenson’s job at Balad Air Base, north of Baghdad, grew from the physics of FM radio signals, which the Army and other military units use to communicate on the ground in Iraq. The signals usually work well, but distance, terrain and even the buildings of a city can block communications, leaving units isolated and out of touch with the people who can help in an emergency. That’s where the Air Force comes in on one of dozens of new roles for the service created to help in Iraq.
Thorstenson’s C-130s fly well above the city and can listen in on the convoys. If someone can’t reach headquarters, crews in the back of the plane can relay the message.
For Army units, the Air Force assistance can bring extra firepower from fighters or send medical evacuation choppers to soldiers who would otherwise be alone in battle.
It’s more than just theory for Thorstenson, whose husband, Capt. Craig Thorstenson of Peterson Air Force Base, is an electronics expert assigned to help the Army here and at any time could be rolling in one of those convoys.
“I obviously have a very personal interest in making sure we catch all the calls,” she said Wednesday. “Not just for my husband, but for all the people on the ground.”
The Thorstensons are among thousands of airmen in Iraq. Some fill familiar jobs, such as dropping bombs in close air support missions, and running passengers and cargo around the country, while others have relatively new roles such as manning machine guns, escorting convoys and helping the Army counter radiocontrolled bombs.
“It’s behind the scenes, and that is completely OK as long as we are there when we are needed,” the captain, a 2000 Air Force Academy graduate, said of her work.
Thorstenson, a Dillon, S.C., native, has flown over Iraq at the controls of a KC-135 tanker that fueled fighters and bombers early in the war. At the academy, she flies T-41 Cessna trainers used to give cadets their introduction to powered flight.
She said the cadets were surprised that their teacher was going back into combat.
“I told them, ‘It’s going to be you someday, and with what you’ll learn in four years at the academy, you’ll be ready when it comes,’” she said.
At Balad, Thorstenson and other airmen live in trailers converted to barracks rooms like the accommodations given their Army comrades. It’s safer here than it once was, but alarms sounded several times Tuesday to warn of mortar attack.
She volunteered to take the job as assistant operations director of Joint Air Battle Staff, a unit at Balad that includes Army and Navy service members.
Much of her work centers on keeping the radio crews trained and making sure the unit’s paperwork is straight.
But about twice a week she climbs into the cargo hold of a C-130 for a long day of listening to radios.
Most days are quiet for the crews as they listen to the chatter from the units on the ground during flights that last hours.
“There are days when you wonder if you’re really helping out,” she said.
The radio crews in the sky jump into action when frantic calls for help come in.
If a unit in trouble doesn’t get a response from their Army headquarters, Thorstenson steps in, walking soldiers through the basics of what they need and relaying the 911-like call to those on the ground who can give aid.
“When things go wrong, we make sure we stay calm,” she said.
She’s sometimes approached by the soldiers who have been helped out through the airborne radio connection. Their gratitude is deep, but Thorstenson tells them she was just doing her job.
She’s scheduled to return next month to the academy, where she plans to pass her war experience on to the next generation of officers.
“I’m going to be able to take this experience right back to them,” Thorstenson said. “I’ll be able to give them a fresh look at what it’s like.”
Thu 28 Feb 2008 09:23
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS 5 / AP / BCN) ― A dozen people were in custody Wednesday after federal law-enforcement targeting a methamphetamine distribution ring raided locations throughout the Bay Area.
The Federal Burea of Investigation said about 200 officers served 10 search warrants and 14 arrest warrants Wednesday in San Francisco, San Jose and Gilroy.
Officers seized more than six pounds of pure methamphetamine and $45,000 in cash, U.S. Attorney Joseph Russoniello said.
Twelve of the indicted suspects were arrested, two more remained fugitives - including one believed to be in Mexico.
Eleven of those arrested appeared later Wednesday in handcuffs in San Francisco federal court for arraignment. They included: Guillermo Zaragoza, 25; Eduardo Zaragoza, 24; Martin Zaragoza, 43; Manuel Contreras, 51; Martel Valencia, 34; Angelica Rodriguez, 33; Paul Kozina, 37; and Irma Corona, 44, all of San Jose; Juan Zaragoza, 30, of Stockton; David Weld, 33, of San Francisco; and David Quezada, 33, of Gilroy.
Those nine men and two women pleaded not guilty to meth conspiracy and distribution charges before U.S. Magistrate Edward Chen. They will all remain in custody until detention hearings set for next week.
Many of those charges carry life sentences, if the accused are convicted and get the maximum.
FBI agent Joseph Schadler said another defendant named in the indictment was in custody but did not appear in court Wednesday. That defendant, Lorenzo Carbajal, 46, of San Jose, is already incarcerated in state prison.
Two other defendants remained at large: Roberto Zaragoza Ruiz, 29, of San Jose, and Richard Parodi, 32, of San Francisco, according to Schadler.
Authorities said Wednesday’s raids were part of a two-year investigation of a distribution ring that was capable of distributing up to 20 pounds of methamphetamine a month.
Schadler described the meth operation as "a family-run organization."
"A lot of (the defendants) are related. It’s definitely a family organization. This is a major distribution ring," he said.
The raids were conducted by San Francisco and San Jose police, FBI agents, the state Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement and a San Mateo County narcotics task force.
Authorities executed warrants at seven homes in San Jose as well as at two homes in San Francisco and one in Gilroy, Schadler said.
Thu 28 Feb 2008 09:00
Lebanon is to stay away from this year’s Paris book fair in protest at the invitation of Israel as guest of honour, Culture Minister Tarek Mitri announced.
Mitri said in a statement Lebanon will not participate this year in protest at the cultural event’s organisers’ decision to select Israel as guest of honour.
Lebanon is the first Arab government to announce a boycott of the March 14 to 19 event after organisers announced that 39 Israeli writers were being invited to mark the 60th anniversary of Israel.
On Tuesday, the 50-nation Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISECSCO), called for a boycott of the event by Islamic states.
The group said the crimes against humanity that Israel is perpetrating in the Palestinian territories… constitute, in themselves, a strong condemnation of Israel, making it unworthy of being welcomed as a guest of honour at an international book fair.
Twenty-five Egyptian groups have announced that they will not take part, as has the Union of Algerian Writers.
In Sanaa, the head of the state-run Public Book Authority, Dr Faris al-Saqqaf, said Yemen would not be participating at the request of the Arab League.
Bahrain and Qatar said they did not normally take part in any case.